If they do this , then form some kind of allliance with acc to get a better deal maybe, and block any further action by big and secIf true this is great for us. TV markets include 11, 16 and 30 I think. Coast to coast. We're #3 and no more PAC.
If they do this , then form some kind of allliance with acc to get a better deal maybe, and block any further action by big and secIf true this is great for us. TV markets include 11, 16 and 30 I think. Coast to coast. We're #3 and no more PAC.
...and block any further action by big and sec
Weird. I think of "Beardown" as a mantra that sometimes helps me in the bathroom.
This is viable for those remaining out west. Clemson has proven that it can be done on a smaller budget.
The B12~B20 will be the first super conference. Scheduling could be 1-9-9 or 3-4-4-4-4. Probably the 1-9-9 because they would be able to package and sell more P4 conference games to ESPN plus. 1-9-9 would allow 1 rival every year and then a rotation of all other teams every other year so all teams would be played every 2 years. This would have better football top to bottom than the Big 10.
Pods
TCU
Baylor
Tech
Houston
Ok st
ISU
Kansas
K st
Utah
BYU
ASU
AU
WVU
UCF
CINN
CU
UO
Or St
UW
Wash St
If they do this , then form some kind of allliance with acc to get a better deal maybe, and block any further action by big and sec
Sounds reasonable but we should pass on Wash State, Oregon State, and Cal. We can pick the top 3 from a broken ACC when it occurs.Wouldn't be surprised if the Big 12 took the remaining 8 PAC12 teams, after the Ducks and the Huskys depart for the BIG.
That would give the Big12 the # 3 conference that could not be overlooked... while BIG and SEC carve up the ACC.
Would think/presume Miami a foregone conclusion for the SEC, as the 9th largest metro area in the US.
While Florida has a history of opposing any potential possibility of FSU in the SEC.
Cal is the perfect conference member. Big state school in #6 TV market with great academics and a punching bag on the field. Like Colorado and Arizona. Bring them on.Sounds reasonable but we should pass on Wash State, Oregon State, and Cal. We can pick the top 3 from a broken ACC when it occurs.
If the Clemson departs the ACC for the Big100, wouldn't it make sense for the Big 12 to consider Miami and Florida State?
I like the idea of taking the PAC 12 schools - AZ, ASU, CO and Utes. That makes sense geographically. That would be a force in basketball for sure.
What does Miami bring to the SEC that TCU doesn’t?
Don’t misunderstand me. I’m not saying TCU a has a shot. But the arguments against TCU (small, private, etc.) seem to apply to Miami, which like TCU may be in a major metro, but one that’s more dominated by the states’ distant but more popular public schools.
So no, I don’t see Miami as a foregone conclusion.
I don’t see any way in which Florida allows FSU or Miami into the SEC, much like aggy and UT won’t let tech or TCU in.If Clemson can get out then FSU and Miami will too. I really don't see any ACC option at this point.
But just speaking hypothetically...if the ACC can break up the GOR, I would think FSU, Clemson and Miami go to the SEC.
B1G would take UNC.
UVA, GT and Syracuse are possibilitiesfor B1G as just bc of academics but I would be surprised if they take any.
NCST might be an option for SEC.
Then, LV, VT and Pitt might be options for the Big 12.
Wake, BC, and Duke might be relegated to the AAC.
Bottom line is the ACC have a millstone around their necks and the B12 really can't sit around and wait for someone to figure out how to bust it up.
I think RN, the B12 has Cougar regret...Houston and BYU...we'll take them but they might get in the way of us getting better institutions.
I don’t see any way in which Florida allows FSU or Miami into the SEC, much like aggy and UT won’t let tech or TCU in.
Miami is way more supported by local people in south Florida than tcu is in Fort Worth. It is not even close. Additionally, Miami has national/regional draw based on historic performance and their 20 years of elite level football.What does Miami bring to the SEC that TCU doesn’t?
Don’t misunderstand me. I’m not saying TCU a has a shot. But the arguments against TCU (small, private, etc.) seem to apply to Miami, which like TCU may be in a major metro, but one that’s more dominated by the states’ distant but more popular public schools.
So no, I don’t see Miami as a foregone conclusion.
The best way for FSU & the U to get relevant again is to join the SEC. Why would UF, Ga or Bama want that? Why help them get back on their feet when they already own the Florida market?That's not an apples to oranges comparison. As down as FSU and Miami have been of late they still carry a huge name and are definitely top 25 programs of all-time.