Purp
Active Member
Tottenham. Whatever you do don't go with Man City, Man U, or Chelsea. You want a club that has a chance to win the league, but isn't like picking the Yankees or Lakers to go with the front runner. A club that is always competitive, but doesn't achieve that level by buying their way to the top. It should also have a legit, home grown superstar.Been watching EPL faithfully for about 4 years now but don’t have a team. Really thinking I am going go with Liverpool. They were so fun to watch last year. Any die hard EPL guys with some HSO’s?
That pretty much leaves you with Tottenham Hotspur. Other great things about the club are the fans/tradition (EPL equivalent of the lovable Cubbies) and a brand new stadium.
The only bad thing I can say about Spurs is that they chose to not retain the name White Hart Lane for it's new stadium. White Hart Lane was home of the club since the 19th century. You can't abandon such a fantastic name when the new stadium is on the same ground as the old stadium. It would be equivalent to the Cubs or Red Sox razing and rebuilding new stadia adjacent to their current, iconic ones and jettisoning the names Wrigley and Fenway.
At least they didn't sell out to a corporate sponsor for naming rights. I can live with Tottenham Hotspur Stadium.
ETA: Initially I learned toward Liverpool like you, but Tom Hicks in the ownership group soured me on that club when he destroyed the Stars and Rangers. I wasn't prepared to have him destroy another of my teams so I picked Spurs.
I also followed Fulham closely bc they always had several Americans in the starting 11. Thrilled to see them back in the EPL. Speaking of great names for stadia, I think Craven Cottage is the best you'll find anywhere. Especially since White Hart Lane is history.
Last edited: