Whatever that is, it's awesome.This topic:
This topic:
I didn't post this to beat this dead horse. I posted it cause he made this comment today, and it's about TCU, and it is completely different from anything he or the committee has said about this topic
Catch me up, what did I miss?Oh, good, this topic again.
Basically what they said. This went unanswered, of courseThe response to that should have been...
“But Ohio St did prove their ability to beat good teams out of conference in the committee’s eyes by losing to a 7-loss VT team by 14 points? Also, in TCU’s out of conference play, they beat Minnesota far worse than Ohio St did that year. How does what you just said mesh with the actual facts of what happened?”
The poster was an OU fan btwThank you for your answer.
Follow up question: Ohio St. was the team that got in over them. They lost a non-conference game to a below average VT team. How can winning all you non-conference games be worse than losing to a below average team in non-conference?
Chameleon, bro
FWIW: I know Handcock personally. He’s a fan of the Frogs. Even wore a TCU hat at the CWS.
I know he gets a lot of heat on this board but he’s just one man in this monopoly.
The one thing I want explained is why the had to revote multiple times.