So, when you say "Wrong, 11 is the lowest at large" just ten minutes ago, you were just being a know nothing POS like you were when you said TCU would be lucky to make the NIT.
So, to review, your method is as follows:
1. State something that is a bit extreme
2. Get called out, but stand behind opinion
3. When facts roll in, change opinion
4. Pretend new opinion was old opinion
There's a reason people think you're a total DB
You see what you want to see.
#1 I said that we would be lucky to make the NIT with a few breaks sarcastically (as evident by my liking the "I see what you did there" post immediately following it)...but I did absolutely say that I felt (at that time) like we were closer to being an NIT team than being, what was the prevailing opinion on the board, a shoe-in, 4-5 seed, Sweet 16-caliber team. I do OWN that opinion...which I stated and re-stated and re-stated in a relatively short period of time AFTER that misinterpreted (by the lower intelligence lifeforms on this thread) post was submitted. So, there wasn't any other data that came in that would have allowed me to stealthily amend my "opinion".
Also...has Ahmed Hamdy had a 20-10 game? Call out that bozo that "guaranteed" it despite 80 college basketball games saying otherwise. Or is it okay to be wrong on a positive prediction, no matter how ridiculous.
#2 I'm standing behind the opinions because they are true; but TCU can prove me wrong by grabbing a 5-7 seed (which is VERY possible...even likely). Quite frankly, I didn't think that we would beat WVU at home or sweep OSU. They already proved me wrong on that.
#3 What facts? The facts won't roll out until Selection Sunday. Right now, it's all up-in-the-air.
#4 My "new opinion"? Check the date/thread when I said that originally...same time frame as when my one post was misinterpreted.
You, my friend, have whiffed on four accusations.