Agreed. Which would be opposite of what they did last year.Should be Alabama.
I feel like the committee will take OSU.
No way they would lack consistency. Not this upstanding, honest, objective committee.Agreed. Which would be opposite of what they did last year.
Agreed. Which would be opposite of what they did last year.
My bet is Bama. And as much as I hate to see two teams from same conference, Bama’s record is just stronger and they’re better.
Why should tOSU get in over USC?
If they do, it will be because OSU played a much tougher schedule than Bama.Should be Alabama.
I feel like the committee will take OSU.
If I recall you have stated previously that you have predicted the playoff participants correctly every year. So who is it? One loss non champion Alabama or two loss champion Ohio State?
OSU p
If they do, it will be because OSU played a much tougher schedule than Bama.
It's supposed to be four best so if the concern about leaving a conference out comes into play while completely contradicting last year then we know this isn't what they say it is.We all know who the first 3 are. I think Alabama should be the 4th, but I’ll say they take OSU. If so it’ll be the wrong pick IMO. I have little confidence in this one like I had the others, just don’t know if they’ll leave another conference out and give the SEC two.
Last year OSU got in on the latter. So if they argue the opposite this year then, again, it is all a sham.Seems to me the 13th data point OSU would claim isn't that great. What's better: 13 data points with two losses or 12 with one loss.
Big 10 has power, and taking 2 from SEC and leaving out “historical” big 10 would cause some major butt hurt. I hope it happens and we can get to 8.Should be Alabama.
I feel like the committee will take OSU.
My bet is Bama. And as much as I hate to see two teams from same conference, Bama’s record is just stronger and they’re better.
Why should tOSU get in over USC?