Moose Stuff
Active Member
Yep. And you can tell it was a catch the first time you watch the replay. That was a perfect example of when a call should be overturned.
Completely different than Max's run that was overturned.
110% correct.
Yep. And you can tell it was a catch the first time you watch the replay. That was a perfect example of when a call should be overturned.
Completely different than Max's run that was overturned.
That’s pretty dumbGame of inches. I'm pretty sure he stepped out, but whether you think it's probable or "indisputable" probably depends on the color you wore today.
They should not have overturned it. It was garbage. A bu guy I know is shocked by it, but will take it none the less.You aren’t taking momentum into account.
And we only needed the conversion for the win. We still had another OT if we missed.
You’re just a beating and it gets old. You absolutely have to have the last word in every single post, I just got tired of it.That’s what someone who has lost the debate says.
I don't see how they had enough to have it not be disputable and overturn it.
You’re just a beating and it gets old. You absolutely have to have the last word in every single post, I just got tired of it.
Your little man complex exudes through your online persona.
So was the other photo on here earlier at the 3.5 or 6? The one with the footprint, I mean.That’s at the 6, he was ruled out at the 3 1/2.
Turf looks to be the 3, but at the same time that's only gonna show the cleats so you can't really tell much from that.So was the other photo on here earlier at the 3.5 or 6? The one with the footprint, I mean.
So was the other photo on here earlier at the 3.5 or 6? The one with the footprint, I mean.
Yeah, but T.D., most of us hear have worn cleats. (I'll admit, a ways back). There aint that much shoe out beyond the cleats.Turf looks to be the 3, but at the same time that's only gonna show the cleats so you can't really tell much from that.
It can be both things. When you score a TD and the officials take it away then that's a terrible job by them. It's the officials job to get this stuff right and screwing crap up this bad on replay is inexcusable.I don't think it matters.
We had first and goal from inside the 5 yard line and even got an extra first down with the penalty and still could not get in.
Ok, let’s take it back. You posted about MD’s foot on the line.That’s what someone who lost the debate would say. If you don’t like my on line persona then don’t post something that’s wrong.
That was not the foot they called him out of bounds on. His foot is on the 6 yard line in that pic and they called him out at the 3 1/2 yard line which was on his next step. I think he probably stepped out on one of the steps but there sure wasn't conclusive evidence that he did and since he was called inbounds by an official staring at and focused on his feet right on the sideline and maybe 3 yards away, i'm not sure how they could overturn that one.
Ok, let’s take it back. You posted about MD’s foot on the line.
I agreed with your post. Agreed.
Didn’t “debate” it as you stated we were in some type of debate. Knowing they couldn’t punch it in from the 2, I wasn’t confident in them being able to do it if they would’ve called MD’s run a TD. It wasn’t saying your post was wrong, yet somehow you took that to be the case I guess because you just couldn’t understand, as you often do, how it related to your post.
Then you started said “debate.”
Again, if you feel like I lost some debate, and that gets your rocks off, go for it man. You win. Congrats on your forum win today. Saturday success.
Uhhhh, Big12 needs someone ranked to get into the CFP... Refs were all Baylor today.Not sure how you or anyone else can be sure. That’s why it shouldn’t have been overturned in the first place.
Bottom line, there is nothing that shows one way or the other. When that’s the case the call on the field stands. Pretty simple