Hefley001 said:
First of all, do you even know what you are referencing? 9-1-3 is Targeting. You better go back and watch the play again and read 9-1-3 and let me know when you're done.
You may be right in one respect: it didn't matter whether or not the defender was "defenseless" (although he was by any definition). Where you are completely wrong is that a defensive back cannot be considered "defenseless". He is an "opponent" which is clearly the only criteria for "who" can be considered defenseless.
TARGETING AND CROWN-OF-HELMET GUIDELINES FOR COACHES, PLAYERS AND OFFICIALS
INTRODUCTION
With the 2013 rule change that makes ejection from the game a part of the penalty for targeting fouls coaches, players and officials need to have a clear understanding of Rules 9-1-3 and 9-1-4. It is very important to understand that
these fouls have not changed from previous years, and officials should officiate these plays as in the past.
The characterization of defenseless players has been expanded (see below), but otherwise these rules for the fouls remain as they have been. It is the
penalty that has changed.
These guidelines are intended to assist everyone involved in the game to understand these rules, which are so important in protecting the safety of the student-athlete.
RULES
Targeting and Initiating Contact With the Crown of the Helmet (Rule 9-1-3)
No player shall target and initiate contact against an opponent with the crown (top) of his helmet. When in question, it is a foul.
Targeting and Initiating Contact to Head or Neck Area of a Defenseless Player (Rule 9-1-4)
No player shall target and initiate contact to the head or neck area of a
defenseless opponent with the helmet, forearm, fist, elbow or shoulder. When in question, it is a foul. (Rule 2-27-14)