Of course stats are important and mean something, but I think you're way too hung up on the whole "simple" thing. In the middle of an intense game players aren't breaking down statistics and percentages in their heads. Robinson isn't a good 3-point shooter, but I still expect him to take a few wide open looks from time to time, like he did last night. He's not the guy we'll draw up a 3-point play for, but he's still going to take a few.
I just see it differently.
Hamdy shoots 80% FTs to Robinson’s 60%.
However, Hamdy has the good sense to be a 0 for 0 3 point shooter because that’s not his game
When attempting to piece together an argument it helps if you know our players’ names or use stats that could actually happen. INTs on 40% of his passes???
I'm done beating the dead horse, but wasn't trying to quote real figures on football, just pointing out that coaches look at simple math every day in most sports to determine if there may be a trend that may need to be reviewed. I know, not rocket science, but simply refuting that math "doesn't work in sports." Batting averages and strike out ratios come to mind. If a guy hit's lefties at a .150 rate, he doesn't face lefties.
Again, I love the team and think they are actually very good, I've just watched this trend for ten conference games in a row and felt the need to express my opinion. I'm done now. I'm sure CJD will either deal with the anomaly or I'm just wrong and life goes on. Either way, the horse is dead to me.