And we have our answerIt’s a fricking no-brainer and anyone with a pair of functioning eyes and a handful or working brain cells knows that the offensive production (or lack thereof) was physically and emotionally draining on the defense.
Has consistently happened over the past several years, and is beyond frustrating.
You can’t look at the two sides in a vacuum, stat wise. They feed off each other.
We also won the TOP several times as well, yay, where did that get us?
Yes the defense had critical let downs. SMU, KSt, and Baylor but good grief they didn’t get a ton of help.
It’s a fricking no-brainer and anyone with a pair of functioning eyes and a handful or working brain cells knows that the offensive production (or lack thereof) was physically and emotionally draining on the defense.
Has consistently happened over the past several years, and is beyond frustrating.
You can’t look at the two sides in a vacuum, stat wise. They feed off each other.
We also won TOP several times as well, yay, where did that get us?
The defense had a few bad games.
The offense had a bad season.
It was a team effort.
Sure...But come on, If you’ve got to pick a side, nobody in their right mind would choose the Def.
why must it be one or the other?
Lot's to work on on both sides of the ball. Per B12 conference stats, the offense ranked sixth in the conference in points scored per game.....the defense ranked......also 6th in points allowed per game. Looks like a push. Also, the offense was 2nd in conference in TOP controlling the ball for just over 32 minutes per game on average.....so our defense got more pine time than eight other teams in the B12.