• The KillerFrogs

Rules Questions for 2024

Some of you said you enjoyed these in past years. I will try to post one every Friday, and maybe something on Monday about a play I saw over the weekend.

Third and goal at the B-5 with 1:19 remaining in the 4th quarter. A24 runs toward the goal line pylon, and the Head Line Judge rules a Touchdown. Video shows that A24 lost possession of the ball at the B-1, and the loose ball struck the pylon.
a) A, Try at the B-3 - No Clock
b) A, 4/Goal at the B-1 - Clock starts on the Ready
c) A, 4/6 at the B-1 - Clock starts on the Snap
d) B, 1/10 at the B-20 - Clock starts on the Snap
 

Horned Toad

Active Member
Some of you said you enjoyed these in past years. I will try to post one every Friday, and maybe something on Monday about a play I saw over the weekend.

Third and goal at the B-5 with 1:19 remaining in the 4th quarter. A24 runs toward the goal line pylon, and the Head Line Judge rules a Touchdown. Video shows that A24 lost possession of the ball at the B-1, and the loose ball struck the pylon.
a) A, Try at the B-3 - No Clock
b) A, 4/Goal at the B-1 - Clock starts on the Ready
c) A, 4/6 at the B-1 - Clock starts on the Snap
d) B, 1/10 at the B-20 - Clock starts on the Snap
Love these by the way Zebra, appreciate the effort!
 

Mean Purple

Active Member
Some of you said you enjoyed these in past years. I will try to post one every Friday, and maybe something on Monday about a play I saw over the weekend.

Third and goal at the B-5 with 1:19 remaining in the 4th quarter. A24 runs toward the goal line pylon, and the Head Line Judge rules a Touchdown. Video shows that A24 lost possession of the ball at the B-1, and the loose ball struck the pylon.
a) A, Try at the B-3 - No Clock
b) A, 4/Goal at the B-1 - Clock starts on the Ready
c) A, 4/6 at the B-1 - Clock starts on the Snap
d) B, 1/10 at the B-20 - Clock starts on the Snap
D.
 

Paint It Purple

Active Member
The recent years practice of players stretching the ball with one hand toward the goal line has a huge downside risk/reward. Especially in last minute situations, as per your example.
 
I wanted to put a poll in here, but failed miserably in my effort, so here is the question and feel free create it as a poll so answers can be anonymous.

At the end of the USC - LSU game, an LSU DB was called for targeting near the sideline. The call was confirmed by Replay. Do you think the call was targeting or not?
 

hometown frog

Active Member
I wanted to put a poll in here, but failed miserably in my effort, so here is the question and feel free create it as a poll so answers can be anonymous.

At the end of the USC - LSU game, an LSU DB was called for targeting near the sideline. The call was confirmed by Replay. Do you think the call was targeting or not?
Yes X 2. I thought he led w the crown of the helmet to the head or neck area AND launched himself towards the player. So I thought it met both aspects of targeting and meant it didn’t matter if we thought the USC was defenseless or not.
 

Frog-in-law1995

Active Member
Didn't see a slo-mo replay, but it sure looked like a leading with the head hit with head to head contact, so, yes. Targeting.
This. I suppose the reason you’re bringing it up is because you disagree, but I can’t think of why, unless maybe there was a recent change to the targeting rule I missed. Sure looks to me like the LSU player leads with the crown of his helmet and the first point of contact between the players is helmet to helmet.
 
Last edited:

Atomic Frawg

Full Member
This. I suppose the reason you’re bringing it up is because you disagree, but I can’t think of why, unless maybe there was a recent change to the targeting rule I missed. Sure looks to me like the LSU player leads with the crown of his helmet and the first point of contact between the players is helmet to helmet.
I wanted to put a poll in here, but failed miserably in my effort, so here is the question and feel free create it as a poll so answers can be anonymous.

At the end of the USC - LSU game, an LSU DB was called for targeting near the sideline. The call was confirmed by Replay. Do you think the call was targeting or not?
The officials confirmed it as targeting in the game. So, you, as @Frog-in-law1995 suggests, must disagree with the call? Otherwise, is this a trick question?
 
I didn't say I disagreed, but I am aware that some of you might, and I wanted to open it up for discussion.
The one thing that needs to be remembered is that "helmet to helmet" contact is NOT automatically targeting. By that I mean that a player could lead with his facemask and make contact with the runner's helmet and that would never be targeting unless it was deemed to be against a defenseless player. In this case, instead of only looking at if it was the crown or not, I think you can make the case the receiver was still defenseless, the question being was he in a position to defend himself? That is up for interpretation.

The following is my opinion only. What Replay has done over the years in an effort to be perfect is to look at things too technically. This leads to long reviews. Targeting was instituted for safety purposes. All they need to do is enforce unnecessary, intentional, and avoidable helmet to helmet contact as a personal foul. Forget trying to determine if it was with the crown or not. Some guys think one inch can be the difference. They often try and pick pepper out of fly poop.
 

AroundWorldFrog

Full Member
@Zebra Frog , quick question. Unsportsmanlike conduct is obviously subjective to some degree. Why would they call a player for trying to rip the ball from the ball carriers hands after the whistle? Happens every play, every game. Seems like Camara was randomly targeted for that.
 
Last edited:

Forum Sponsor

Fort Worth Sports Commission

KillerFrogs is proud to be sponsored by the Fort Worth Sports Commission who is focused on enhancing the image, economy, and quality of life for Fort Worth through the power of sports.

Top