When your turnovers lead to about as many points as you score all game, you aren’t a valuable player.
So again, 13 points is more than 9. That’s simple math.13 points, 4 turnovers led to 9 points by the other team.
This is exactly my thoughts watching this game. Our guys somehow look younger and older than these guys playing.The quicks and athleticism on Houston and Aggies is on another level from TCU
So again, 13 points is more than 9. That’s simple math.
He was also the leading rebounder of either team. And it’s not like he was alone, Williams had 3 turnovers and 2 other players for CU had 2 each. Hell, Kolek for Marquette had 6 and I’m certain your wouldn’t say he’s a liability or non-valuable player.
But that doesn’t matter to your narrative, right.
Well that’s always been the case with him. He has to be invested and too often he seems to not be for whole games or just moments in games.I was posting live in the game. His turnovers stopped in the second half, but he game up on defense. Giving up 9 on turnovers and not defending the rim are major issues. Subtract just the 2 layups made my Kolek (7 inches shorter) in which Lampkin didn’t leave the ground to defend and his liability of 13 points equals the 13 he made. That’s ignoring the rest of his poor defense.
Like at TCU, he can turn it on and be a force, or put forth minimal effort and be a liability. You don’t know what Lampkin you’ll get.