There is a continuation of double talk and misdirection coming out of our football program via Donati and GP, referring to the Startlegram article on the interview with Donati. Donati said that he and GP have been working on the football situation for several months and that TCU has the resources available to accomplish their mission.
Now, think about what that article was focusing on and the immediate results we get with the Anderson move. We must not really have the resources Donati was adamant about because it is very doubtful that a national search was done to hire the best offensive line coach we could find. This is what depresses me more than anything about our program. Too much coverup, misdirection, and sleight of hand.
as i said in another thread on this subject, i am not certain this was a matter of what tcu
COULD do, but instead what gary
CHOSE to do with this move.
all jokes and comments about anderson aside (and i have been quite clear on my thoughts on this decision) i think gary values anderson's loyalty and willingness to be moved around to whichever position group he is asked to coach. no different than gary loves the player who will move to whatever position the team needs him, anderson has coached wide receivers, running backs, and offensive line multiple times because gary has asked him to do that.
granted, i can't think of too many head coaches who have made a similar choice once let alone twice, but remember that gary is the guy who had his linebackers coached for two years by a ga and no regular position coach. gary is going to do what gary wants to do with his staff and we have seen this time and time again so to me this isn't a matter of what gary could offer, but what he chose to do.
i think they really like tony savino and garrett altman and believe that with those two handling the technical part of the teaching the frogs can have similar success to what they say in 2014-15 when the frogs had a ga handled most of the o-line coaching.
this move does make the next hiring decisions critical. do you go after a running back coach like joseph turner or chris brasfield? do you go after andrew hayes-stoker to fill the second receiver position and help him mentor not only the young receivers but a young coach in malcolm kelly who appears to have a really bright future?
finally, i still believe the frogs are going to bring in an analyst to help provide structure and design to this offense. i don't believe it is going to be a cutting edge offense guy like other sites have mentioned, but i could see as i mentioned someone like jerry kill who has a great relationship with gary, could be a mentor to cumbie, and has run the balanced, run first type of offense gary seems to want and i am perfectly happy with. just give me something with a plan.