Froggish
Active Member
This kid would be great in GPs system! We are late to the party on an offer. I would assume we wouldn’t offer unless there is some interest
This kid would be great in GPs system! We are late to the party on an offer. I would assume we wouldn’t offer unless there is some interest
I always find this criticism interesting regarding Cumbie developing QB’s. I thought Boykin and Hill improved a lot. Regarding Robinson, you can only do so much if the kid doesn’t do his part.We know Cumbie can recruit QB's, but can he develop any one of them now that he has 3 that were 4 star recruits. At some point very very soon, he has to prove that he can also develop that talent. If not, then it's time to move on to someone else as OC.
With GP's defense, there is no reason we shouldn't be winning more games. We need an offense that compliments Gary's defense like we had with our Peach Bowl team.
I always find this criticism interesting regarding Cumbie developing QB’s. I thought Boykin and Hill improved a lot. Regarding Robinson, you can only do so much if the kid doesn’t do his part.
What about this play?We could probably stand to take a break on the shovel pass, wild frog, and short route on 2nd & 1, then 3rd & 1. JS
I always find this criticism interesting regarding Cumbie developing QB’s. I thought Boykin and Hill improved a lot. Regarding Robinson, you can only do so much if the kid doesn’t do his part.
Respectfully disagree concerning Hill. I think his improvement had more to do with the coaches pulling back the reins on him and turning him into mostly a game manager whose main priority was to avoid turnovers. I know it's a very touchy subject on here and people have very different opinions but that is mine.
So they developed him?
I agree but don’t you have to give credit for playing to Hill’s strength instead of forcing plays that Hill won’t do as well? And I would consider that developing him because he did a lot better job at not turning the ball over the 2nd year.Respectfully disagree concerning Hill. I think his improvement had more to do with the coaches pulling back the reins on him and turning him into mostly a game manager whose main priority was to avoid turnovers. I know it's a very touchy subject on here and people have very different opinions but that is mine.
I always find this criticism interesting regarding Cumbie developing QB’s. I thought Boykin and Hill improved a lot. Regarding Robinson, you can only do so much if the kid doesn’t do his part.
So you think Boykin makes the same jump from 2013 to 2014 if we had the same QB coach?I think the argument is that with both Boykin and Hill, Cumbie got two QBs that had a fair amount of development invested in them before he ever got a hold of them. The maturation of a QB has as much to do with experience as it does the coach coaching him. Both of those QBs had been in a college football program for 2 years. When looking through that perspective, at least some of the questioning of Cumbie’s abilities makes since.
I think it was way more about the new offensive scheme with Meacham and Cumbie as Co-OC’s than it was Cumbie specifically teaching Boykin how to play QB as his position coach.So you think Boykin makes the same jump from 2013 to 2014 if we had the same QB coach?
Agreed but just to give an example, I remember them talking about how they really worked on deceiving with the QB eyes to help look people off. Boykin did a really good job with his eyes by still being able to see the WR while keeping his helmet in line with the middle of the field.I think it was way more about the new offensive scheme with Meacham and Cumbie as Co-OC’s than it was Cumbie specifically teaching Boykin how to play QB as his position coach.
Boykin showed lots of flashes in 2012 & 2013, but the offensive system was so incredibly inept, no QB could have succeeded.
I agree with 99.9% of your thoughts, but not sure I follow this line of thinking.I agree but don’t you have to give credit for playing to Hill’s strength instead of forcing plays that Hill won’t do as well? And I would consider that developing him because he did a lot better job at not turning the ball over the 2nd year.