I'd be tempted to move Alabama up from 25 after only losing by 5 to a top 15 team playing only 3 players for the final 10 minutes of the game.Correct, they are currently 14. I wanted to highlight that game since it should bounce Bama out of the Top 25, helping the Frogs move up. Don't see Bama sliding too far tho, considering a 5 pt loss to a Top 15 team
Interesting stuff, thank you... I think this team is better than .500 in conference.Again, too early to mean much, but when your non-conference schedule is “meh”, it is important to win. The Frogs have so far and that Belmont win popped our RPI up 18 spots to #10. Not a bad spot to be.
Other RPIs include #1 A&M (6-0), #3 Duke (9-0), #5 Kansas (6-0), #8 Nevada (7-0), #20 Iowa St (4-2), #27 WVU (6-1), #39 Texas Tech (6-0), #59 Baylor (5-1), #79 Belmont (4-4), #80 Tennessee Tech, #93 Texas Southern (0-6), #112 Texas (5-2), #116 OU (4-1), #127 Vandy (3-4), #138 Oklahoma State (6-1). #141 New Mexico (2-4), #143 South Dakota (4-2), #145 Kansas State (6-1), #146 SMU (6-2), #152 St. Bonaventure (4-2), #172 W&M (3-2), #174 Yale (4-4), #230 ULM (2-3), #250 Omaha (1-7).
This early, every W/L has a big impact. So true 1.00 in the win % column is really keeping us up. Frogs should beat Yale, but a loss to SMU would drop that number from 1.00 to .888, and the RPI tank would take quite a hit.
Bottom line is it’s too early for RPI to mean much. But the frogs need to win as many OOC games as possible. Then .500 or even 8-10 in league play could get us in the tournament.
Interesting stuff, thank you... I think this team is better than .500 in conference.
One thing that has impressed me is that it's nearly a new hero every night. Bane goes off one day, Vlad a couple in the next week, then KWill another day. Makes it really hard to shut us down.
I'm surprised the defense is brought up as a specific area to improve. I get continuous incremental improvement, but I thought to this point it's been pretty good. Teams with weird schemes like Belmont, or fire-ass shooters like the kid from USD, get open shots. But I think we play solid D most days and a lot of times it triggers great offensive opportunities.
I saw a body language thing last night, maybe - or maybe was lost in translation. I hope Olden doesn't get discouraged. I know it's hard to adjust into a new scheme and squad, especially when major role players have been there for multiple years and long stretches of PT can be hard to get. But Shawn - keep your head up. You're putting in the effort. We WILL need you to go off a few times this year.
Huh... that fg% number surprises me. I guess we're looking a little like the 09 Saints - a lot of give, but very opportunistic.We are dead last in the conference in FG % defense. And that's with Belmont missing a thousand wide open looks last night.
I noticed a little bit of body language with another, much bigger piece also. Likely nothing but a bit odd.
Is that a piece of the puzzle that wears an extremely low number, and handles the ball a lot?
I saw it too, almost got a read of illness from that, like a cold or flu...