Matthew Stafford has done alright. I don't know about the rest. Your knocking of system high schools is what led us to miss out on Baker Mayfield out of Lake Travis. And there are other good QBs that come out of system high schools: Andy Dalton, Kyler Murray, Chase Daniel, etc.
Our general recruiting seems mostly based on potential and high ceilings. But that has also led us to have a group of receivers who can't consistently catch and get open. I'm saying the solution is we balance that with getting a few guys that we know can play football irrespective of their measurables or potential. If we had just one of those possession receivers this year, we probably win at least 2 or 3 more games.
first, matthew stafford was one of the highest rated quarterback prospects in the country his senior year and there were no questions on the tools. no comparison between he and morris.
andy dalton didn't come out of system high school at katy. his primary function was handing off and if katy wanted to mix things up they will run a pitch play. that is a far, far cry from a high school system.
tcu wasn't the only one to miss on baker, hell tech had him on campus and weren't sold on him enough so you are reaching to say we should recruit chandler morris because of missing on baker.
kyler was not a system quarterback, he was one of the highest rated prospects in the country and again comparing him to morris is about as accurate as comparing stafford to morris.
finally, i am still not getting how the decision to recruit morris at quarterback is going to address any recruiting misses at receiver. the frogs should recruits players with lesser potential talent at other positions to address the problems at receiver?