rifram09
Active Member
GImme a break.PO Frog said:My problem is he doesn't go for it like a man on the 4th and 1 and 4th and 2 earlier in the game. Especially since our punter consistently kicks it to the 17. Useless IMO
GImme a break.PO Frog said:My problem is he doesn't go for it like a man on the 4th and 1 and 4th and 2 earlier in the game. Especially since our punter consistently kicks it to the 17. Useless IMO
Everybody on here blasting GP and yet we were one play away from winning a game that none of you truly expected to win. Maybe a bunch of the stuff he did tonight was way more right than you're giving him credit for.PO Frog said:My problem is he doesn't go for it like a man on the 4th and 1 and 4th and 2 earlier in the game. Especially since our punter consistently kicks it to the 17. Useless IMO
Defense bought in too. Impressive effort tonight. Hope to see the same next week.Prince of Purpoole said:Also...Aaron Green has the heart of a champion
Moose Stuff said:Everybody on here blasting GP and yet we were one play away from winning a game that none of you truly expected to win. Maybe a bunch of the stuff he did tonight was way more right than you're giving him credit for.
Because everyone knows you absolutely must have seven days after a 3OT game to have any chance of winning. I liked the decision and the play call. Should have left it with "we went for the win because that's what we do". I'll never believe (and nobody else would either) that the coaches huddled quickly and said..."Damn...we have a game in five days that we can't win if we go to OT here."TCURiggs said:
Sounds very logical to me
At least he has peaches. There are a lot of folks here that have nothing but cotton balls.TCURiggs said:https://twitter.com/MNewhouse74/status/668291988962213888
If you told me their QB would not play the second half I'm not sure I'd be saying we had no chance to win since I thought we had a fighting chance anyways. Fans was way worse than I imagined he would be and the defense stepped up. Think our coaching staff failed in game management tonight, same as they've struggled in close games for years. Regardless of what anybody thought, burning a timeout on a punt and a defensive substitution are not good coaching moves.Moose Stuff said:Everybody on here blasting GP and yet we were one play away from winning a game that none of you truly expected to win. Maybe a bunch of the stuff he did tonight was way more right than you're giving him credit for.
I was quoting the other poster about being a man. It's a message board, lighten up.Rifram09 said:GImme a break.
Pharm Frog said:Because everyone knows you absolutely must have seven days after a 3OT game to have any chance of winning. I liked the decision and the play call. Should have left it with "we went for the win because that's what we do". I'll never believe (and nobody else would either) that the coaches huddled quickly and said..."Damn...we have a game in five days that we can't win if we go to OT here."
You think they have to huddle to make that decision?Pharm Frog said:Because everyone knows you absolutely must have seven days after a 3OT game to have any chance of winning. I liked the decision and the play call. Should have left it with "we went for the win because that's what we do". I'll never believe (and nobody else would either) that the coaches huddled quickly and said..."Damn...we have a game in five days that we can't win if we go to OT here."
Does somebody need their pacifier?Mean Purple said:Patterson's stubborn refusal to make the obvious decision cost the Frogs huge. Every year he finds a way to do that. You go for 1. And win you could not get 1 earlier...you most certainly go for 1 there. Goodbye conference championship. Goodbye major bowl shot.
He needs to apologize to the team. He blew it. They worked too hard to risk it on a low percentage play. We were owning OU at the end of the game and stood a way better chance with overtime...which we would not have needed had he gone for 1 earlier.
Hell yeah! They were cracking skulls. Only got gashed after turnovers when they were on field for log periods of time. Very solid effort by the D.Jake102 said:
Whatever he did to his defense since last week was awesome. Finally looked more like a TCU defense.
Hell yeah! They were cracking skulls. Only got gashed after turnovers when they were on field for log periods of time. Very solid effort by the D.Jake102 said:
Whatever he did to his defense since last week was awesome. Finally looked more like a TCU defense.
A "new" team huh? Need another tissue?Tre J said:That's the kind of call the committee wants us to make. A "new" team trying to prove their worth.
Okay...would it still be possible to win on Friday if we played only 2 OT sessions? Or one? I said it sounds excuse-ish and it does to me. And an unnecessary justification at that. He has already handled the question well.TCURiggs said:
You really don't see that he's saying running/defending 15, 20 or 30 more plays, and getting home an hour or more later, could be a detriment when they have a game in five days? Setting the extra effort/time aside, what if someone else got injured?
I don't think so.Boomhauer said:Would an 11-1 BU (Big 12 champ) make CFP?