I am not one of those posters. I'd love to see a better half-court offense and a much improved in-bounds strategy. But, if the execution of our team is so bad, what other coach would be better?
impossible question to answer because to answer it you have to either assume every other variable would be the same or project other things that there just is no way to know.
example, if tcu had hired brad underwood instead of jamie we have no idea who is signed in underwood's 3 classes coming into this year, who transfers in, who transfers out, and if brad leaves for illinois after 1 season.
there is no doubt dixon has done good things with the program and the recruiting class has great potential. as i wrote above there are very definite things that have to be addressed to keep the program competitive in the big 12 and that includes filing out the roster, developing players, and making what changes dixon and his staff believe need to be made prior to next season.
not a make or break situation, but i do think it is important going into year 4 to start showing progress with his guys in his program. years 1 and 2 he had williams and vlad to carry a great deal of the load. year 4 will be his guys.
i did find this link to an old cbs article grading 15 heading coaching hires in 2016. interesting to go back and look at who really has had success in their new jobs, who is treading water, and who has been a bust.
https://www.cbssports.com/college-b...ng-college-basketball-coaching-hires-of-2016/