don't understand the logic of this when you call for the firing of gary and at times i feel as if gary knows if he wins the right games, wins enough, and the players don't get out of control he can do what he wants behind his purple curtain as long as he wants to be the hc
You're prolly right.
Steel is conflicted. Steel was "raised" on a TCU that was a lovable loser. From that standpoint, beating UT and winning a few games is a good year.
Since Gary's arrival, losing or .500 records are unacceptable. We went from many consecutive bowl-less years to bowls every year.
The question appears to be, since Gary is largely responsible for building TCU into what it became (but is no more), does HE get to decide how and when he goes? Even if he drags TCU back into the gutter along the way?