Oakman never got convicted of anything.
Actually, dumb scheiss, Oakman DID get convicted. When the verdict reads, "We the Jury find the Defendant GUILTY," that means you are convicted. The conviction was much later reversed on appeal. So "never convicted of anything," is, to keep it simple for a simpleton, a lie.
Turpin, on the other hand, will have his charge dismissed, without EVER having any conviction, upon completion of his probation.
So you are basically batting a thousand in being wrong. Kudos.
I know Baylors don't let facts or words get in the way of their stupid, but at least want you to be aware of your stupid, since you probably were too stupid to know your stupid.