Jefffrog1993
KMA
Yep.
We will have more fans than Kansas! I also bet the ratings suck too.
Yep.
"Did he just catch that ball???" said the announcer. Yes, he did.
Peach Bowl, DK intercepting a Bo Wallace pass in the Ole Miss end zone. One of my favorite Frog plays EVER!!!!
I'm going to guess that ECoastFrog won't be hiring you in your official capacity as a gigolo.Ummm..... DK did not catch an INT in the Ole Miss end zone. That was James McFarland. I hope you are senile if you can't remember who made your favorite Frog play EVER!!!!!
I don’t even know what to think anymore.There’s a hysterical (not sure how else to label it) update over at 247 in regards to our QB depth.
No worry, it happens.I am elderly and I am having memory problems. But I still love my Frogs. I already apologized, if you will look back.
So maybe there's more truth in my comment of Taye Barber being the next choice at QB than I originally thought.There’s a hysterical (not sure how else to label it) update over at 247 in regards to our QB depth.
There’s a hysterical (not sure how else to label it) update over at 247 in regards to our QB depth.
I'm starting to worry that info isn't as good as I thought.....
JC is only as accurate as his sources want him to be.
My bad MTfrog5! Your are exactly correct. It was Hackett’s seventh IT of the year, and it was a thing of beauty. Where are those ITs this season? Oh well...Nope. That was Hackett. Kindred was later in the game but before McFarland’s pick 6
With all the players out we have, Kansas may pack it thinking they have a win.We will have more fans than Kansas! I also bet the ratings suck too.
With all the players out we have, Kansas may pack it thinking they have a win.
meh, pay sites often get through with "info you'll only see there" that is reported by other sites, often just a couple of hours later. Will be interesting to see how that world evolves with the onset of The Athletic and then projects like the one Gil is doing now. Lots of experience on those two staffs. May be considered a better option for info to pay for, due to the level of reporting and analysis.I'm getting worried that JC is being played hardcore, especially this season. I'd be furious if I were him after putting in the hours and doing things the right way. He's going to lose people if these things keep happening.
There’s a hysterical (not sure how else to label it) update over at 247 in regards to our QB depth.
I understand that pay sites are pay sites and it would be unfair to share an article, or even news, here. That said, it's getting a bit tiring constantly seeing "JC said something interesting on 247" "Yeah that's not good" "Not sure if he's right but if so that's a problem" and then nobody who isn't a member over there has any clue what is even being talked about.I'm starting to worry that info isn't as good as I thought.....
JC is only as accurate as his sources want him to be.
JC said he’s going to ask about it today at the press conference for what it’s worth. Now who knows what GP will respond with but it will at least give you an idea of who it’s about.I understand that pay sites are pay sites and it would be unfair to share an article, or even news, here. That said, it's getting a bit tiring constantly seeing "JC said something interesting on 247" "Yeah that's not good" "Not sure if he's right but if so that's a problem" and then nobody who isn't a member over there has any clue what is even being talked about.
(Not picking on either Moose or Jake, just using this as an example)
I understand that pay sites are pay sites and it would be unfair to share an article, or even news, here. That said, it's getting a bit tiring constantly seeing "JC said something interesting on 247" "Yeah that's not good" "Not sure if he's right but if so that's a problem" and then nobody who isn't a member over there has any clue what is even being talked about.
(Not picking on either Moose or Jake, just using this as an example)