Daylon Mack
- Thread starter froginmn
- Start date
berryfrog95
Active Member
Just got picked by Baltimore #160
Not a bad team to go to for him
Not a bad team to go to for him
Frog-in-law1995
Active Member
Who?
JogginFrog
Active Member
Just in case he wants to know who runs that state:
http://running.net/maryland-running-calendar
https://www.visitmaryland.org/list/runs-and-races
http://running.net/maryland-running-calendar
https://www.visitmaryland.org/list/runs-and-races
Moose Stuff
Active Member
Would have been great for us IMO.
No way. I think all the DTs we’ve had in that same time frame that didn’t get drafted were clearly better.
Eight
Member
the big question on a guy like mack is if he had come to tcu would he have bought into what he was asked to do at tcu.
not just in terms of defensive scheme, but would he give the effort expected of him in practice? do the work in the weight room? study film?
if the answer is no the result doesn't change.
could fitch and patterson gotten that out of him? never know and lets not forget it wasn't that long ago the frogs have an impact freshman defensive linemen who seemed destined for a high draft pick until he continually [ Finebaum ] the bed.
not just in terms of defensive scheme, but would he give the effort expected of him in practice? do the work in the weight room? study film?
if the answer is no the result doesn't change.
could fitch and patterson gotten that out of him? never know and lets not forget it wasn't that long ago the frogs have an impact freshman defensive linemen who seemed destined for a high draft pick until he continually [ Finebaum ] the bed.
Bingo. I hate the “if he would have come here then x would’ve happened” theories. Yes, it seems like we should have more success recruiting D-lineman but when we routinely produce All-Conference players and quite a few draft picks from the position it’s hard to argue that we’re need to recruit a lot better.
froginmn
Full Member
The difference is that guys go to A&M with first round pick potential and end up in round 5, whereas guys like Ben and LJ come to TCU with late round and UDFA potential and leave as high draft picks.
Arguable but that wasn’t my point. My point was backing up moose’s point, which was that we would have loved to have had him and his talent as he was better than anyone we had in that same class if you are to believe NFL scouting.
Billy Clyde
Active Member
That's a lot of rounds.
Even though his college career didn't pan out the way most would have projected, just based on potential there's no way you can let that guy slide to the 161st round
ftwfrog
Active Member
Because there are some of us who are upset that he played us like a fiddle.
Froggish
Active Member
I don’t recall us consistently having any DT/Nose types drafted...In fact we haven’t had one...Blacklock or Bethley may break that..I hope.
As for the argument we need to recruit a lot better...Well I think we do at certain positions. We need better talent in the interior OL as well as Safety.....Do we seem to get the most out of who we get absolutely...But I don’t have a problem saying I want as many kids with high ceilings as I can get and we have room to improve on the recruiting trail.
Those 2 schools will always get a lot of pros
netty2424
Full Member
FIFY
Seriously
