This is the only approach. You have to send the message to players and recruits that they are all in or all out. Transfer after the season if you want, but announce in season and no weight room, no training table, no tutoring, etc.
NIL contracts will catch up to this, too. It'd be a bad look to see boosters suing players for non-compliance, but they'll learn to limit up-front money and spread the distribution over time.
I just don't get it from the players' perspective. Desperate lower-level schools may pick up guys like this from the portal, but telling D1 coaches that you aren't willing to do the work without assurance of playing time seems like a good way to reduce your opportunities. Both lazy and short-sighted.
This could literally happen to any team and will be the death knell of college football if left unchecked. Even pros have a commitment they need to live by to get their money (called a contract) and NIL should have some form or fashion of this or this will continue to happen.
But schollys are guaranteed for one year, and the expectation is that students will fulfill the terms for that year--or at least the competitive season. When they don't do so, you pull the benefits that remain under your control.the ncaa created this by allowing players to play up to 4 games and still redshirt combined with more open transfer rules
schools recruit over kids and the scholarships are not guaranteed for a full 5 years so all I see is players taking the initiative
But schollys are guaranteed for one year, and the expectation is that students will fulfill the terms for that year--or at least the competitive season. When they don't do so, you pull the benefits that remain under your control.
Got it. I don't think I understood that redshirting rules apply to the player whether the school applies the designation or not.understood, my point was that these decisions being made 1/3 of the way through the season are a byproduct of the ncaa rule change and that the decision by the player is driven by saving that one year
Allegedly.The all important question that no-one is asking, do any of these players that are transferring out have any information on the 5 dead ladies of the evening?
LOLAllegedly.
Got it. I don't think I understood that redshirting rules apply to the player whether the school applies the designation or not.
The article mentioned that the sitting out "trend" was also due to lengthened eligibility due to the pandemic. As that phases out, does it reduce players' likelihood to sit out?
SMU and Beth Mowins go together like....????SMU 13-10 at the half at UCF tonight…
screen name checks outAllegedly.
That is not Beth Mowins.SMU and Beth Mowins go together like....????
I heard they are buried outside the stadium and have their own scoreboard just like the aggy dogs.The all important question that no-one is asking, do any of these players that are transferring out have any information on the 5 dead ladies of the evening?
SMU hired a coach who came from a program that sucked last year and fired everyone.
They will probably go 5-7 not win any games of note, and once again demand in the offseason to be added to a power conference because Dallas and potential.