• The KillerFrogs

A Few Updates on TCU's Finances, Coach's Salaries

TCU has filed their tax return for FY2016-2017, which includes salary data for the Universities top earners during the calendar year 2016. Here are a few highlights:

Link To Data Here

- The university had another record year on the top line
- Over the last five year's, the University has had almost $600 million in surplus receipts... It appears this is mostly going towards investments, such as "revenue generating buildings" that don't get as much donor support
- For the first time in a long time, the debt load TCU carries went down YoY, which also helped lower interest payments.
- The endowment finished the year at $1.471 billion, just missing a record high from several years ago.

And everyone's favorite juicy details:
- Coach Patterson received a contract extension in August of 2016, but his compensation was largely unchanged that year. We shall see if things start moving in 2017.
- Coach Schlossnagle got his Longhorn-Contract in summer 2016, and his 2016 compensation reflected the rumored change in pay to $1-1.4 million in annual pay. His 2016 base comp was $871k, which if you do the math does show a likely 2017 salary of around $1.2 million.
- CDC... Nevermind.
- We fired and hired basketball coaches in 2016... Now get ready to hear something crazy: We paid MORE to Trent Johnson to GO AWAY than we paid to Pitt to get Dixon out of his contract there.
- In firing Trent Johnson, TCU will have to pay him $4.8 million, the full remaining value on his contract at the time of firing. $1.7 in 2016, $2.5 in 2017, $625k in 2018.
- In hiring Jamie Dixon, TCU had to pay Pitt $1.5 million to buy out his contract. The Pitt AD all but admitted the contracted buyout was actually closer to $10 million, but the University decided to let Dixon go.
- Based on Dixon's partial 2016 pay, you can extrapolate his pay rate (first year) was $3.1 million.
- When compared to the average market cost for a HC & their sport-peers, TCU is paying Jamie Dixon better than Gary Patterson. Jamie is approximately the 11th highest paid NCAABB HC, Gary is closer to the NCCAFB 20th.
- We finally have a look at Sonny Cumbie's pay: $775k, and that's before his extension at the end of the year... Another Longhorn-Contract if you've forgotten, and I would guess we will see him up above $1 million in 2017.

Don't believe that FWST article, look at the data in the sheet. They overgeneralize and don't understand the pay structures.
 
Last edited:

TCURiggs

Active Member
- In firing Trent Johnson, TCU will have to pay him $4.8 million, the full remaining value on his contract at the time of firing. $1.7 in 2016, $2.5 in 2017, $625k in 2018.
- In hiring Jamie Dixon, TCU had to pay Pitt $1.5 million to buy out his contract. The Pitt AD all but admitted the contracted buyout was actually closer to $10 million, but the University decided to let Dixon go.
- Based on Dixon's partial 2016 pay, you can extrapolate his pay rate (first year) was $3.1 million.
- When compared to the average market cost for a HC & their sport-peers, TCU is paying Jamie Dixon better than Gary Patterson. Jamie is approximately the 11th highest paid NCAABB HC, Gary is closer to the NCCAFB 20th.

- We finally have a look at Sonny Cumbie's pay: $775k, and that's before his extension at the end of the year... Another Longhorn-Contract if you've forgotten, and I would guess we will see him up above $1 million in 2017.

Don't believe that FWST article, look at the data in the sheet. They overgeneralize and don't understand the pay structures.

giphy.gif
 

Big Frog II

Active Member
We do have three great coaches, and they have certainly earned their keep. The 70's, 80's, and most of the 90's show what happens when you nickel and dime your athletic programs. I am so glad we are now proactive. The entire school has benefited.
 
'TCU Quick Reference Fall 2017' list the University's total investments at $1,708,225K.

Are some of those investments not considered a part of the University's productive

endowment?
 

Brog

Full Member
- For the first time in a long time, the debt load TCU carries went down YoY, which also helped lower interest payments

Would be interesting to know what IS the total debt load TCU is now carrying. Glad to see that it apparently went down this last year. With all the building going on, hard to see how the debt load could have gone down.
 
- For the first time in a long time, the debt load TCU carries went down YoY, which also helped lower interest payments

Would be interesting to know what IS the total debt load TCU is now carrying. Glad to see that it apparently went down this last year. With all the building going on, hard to see how the debt load could have gone down.

$522 million.

They refinanced and retired some older debt that was tied to campus commons construction, it appears.
 
Top