• The KillerFrogs

2022 March Madness Thread

I suspect there are more than a few broken links in the KF March Madness brackets—apropos :mad:o_O:p. This might be historic, though some might say it is a bit presumptuous to use that descriptor for a basketball tourney, which at some level is insignificant while the world turns.
 
Last edited:

LVH

Active Member
Saint Peter's just beat the deepest team in the tournament... Purdue will never have a better roster than they had this year and they couldn't even make the Elite 8... I believe Purdue had the best roster top to bottom in the country
 
Saint Peter's just beat the deepest team in the tournament... Purdue will never have a better roster than they had this year and they couldn't even make the Elite 8... I believe Purdue had the best roster top to bottom in the country

Here, Purdue and Texas Tech were deemed a bit one-dimensional relative to other top-four seeds:​

Which teams are primed to underperform?​

Top-four seeds in the 2022 men’s NCAA Tournament by their rankings in KenPom’s adjusted offensive and defensive efficiency and the difference between those rankings and the average underperforming team at that seed

VS. UNDERPERFORMER*
TEAM▲▼SEED▲▼ADJ. OFF. RK▲▼ADJ. DEF. RK▲▼OFF.▲▼DEF.▲▼
Gonzaga11710.95.0
Arizona15206.9-8.0
Kansas16295.9-17.0
Baylor19142.9-2.0
Auburn2248-8.119.8
Kentucky242711.90.8
Villanova28287.9-0.2
Duke27448.9-16.2
Wisconsin34938-19.3-4.1
Tennessee3363-6.330.9
Purdue3310026.7-66.1
Texas Tech3651-35.332.9
UCLA4151213.923.6
Illinois423305.95.6
Providence43179-2.1-43.4
Arkansas44016-11.119.6
*Underperformers are teams that lost in the tournament before their seed line would suggest they should. Average rankings are taken of seeds since the 2002 tournament. Efficiency rankings as of March 14.

SOURCES: KENPOM.COM, SPORTS-REFERENCE.COM
There’s one obvious candidate to be the next one-trick pony to fall short thanks to shoddy defense: the Purdue Boilermakers, who are perhaps the poster children for elite scoring paired with mediocre stopping.
 
Last edited:

Endless Purple

Full Member
NCAA Tournament Conferences with multiple teams:
Through the Sweet Sixteen..

ACC with 5 teams: 11-2
Virginia Tech (0-1), N Carolina (3-0), Duke (3-0), Notre Dame (2-1), Miami (3-0)

Big 12 with 6 teams: 10-5
Kansas (3-0), Baylor (1-1), Texas Tech (2-1), Texas (1-1), TCU (1-1), Iowa St (2-1)

American with 2 teams: 4-1
Houston (3-0), Memphis (1-1)

Big East with 6 teams: 6-5
VIllanova (3-0), Providence (2-1), UConn (0-1), Seton Hall (0-1), Marquette (0-1), Creighton (1-1)

SEC with 6 teams: 5-5
Kentucky (0-1), Tennessee (1-1), Auburn (1-1), LSU (0-1), Arkansas (3-0), Alabama (0-1)

- - - - done - - - -

Pac 12 with 3 teams: 4-3
Arizona (2-1), UCLA (2-1), USC (0-1)

West Coast with 3 teams: 3-3
Gonzaga (2-1). St Marys (1-1), San Francisco (0-1)

Big 10 with 9 teams: 9-9
Purdue (2-1), Iowa (0-1), Illinois (1-1), Wisconsin (1-1), Ohio St (1-1), Michigan (2-1), Indiana (1-1), Michigan St (1-1), Rutgers (0-1)

Atlantic 10 with 2 teams: 1-2
Richmond (1-1), Davidson (0-1)

MWC with 4 teams: 0-4
Boise St (0-1), Colorado St (0-1), San Diego St (0-1), Wyoming (0-1)
 

JogginFrog

Active Member
There’s one obvious candidate to be the next one-trick pony to fall short thanks to shoddy defense: the Purdue Boilermakers, who are perhaps the poster children for elite scoring paired with mediocre stopping.
Great analysis in that Fivethirtyeight piece. Just watched the Purdue-St. Peter's condensed game and couldn't believe how little pressure Purdue applied on defense. Just 8 turnovers for a team that averaged 13.6 in the MAAC. That and 19-for-21 at the line will usually get it done.
 
Great analysis in that Fivethirtyeight piece. Just watched the Purdue-St. Peter's condensed game and couldn't believe how little pressure Purdue applied on defense. Just 8 turnovers for a team that averaged 13.6 in the MAAC. That and 19-for-21 at the line will usually get it done.
Yes, it was part of an interesting article by 538 titled, “The top-seeded men’s teams that could bust your bracket.” I should’ve referenced that.
 
Last edited:
Top