TCUdirtbag
Active Member
Does that mean this is just an epic participation trophy?
IIRC they all endorsed Hillary, too.
Does that mean this is just an epic participation trophy?
If I don't respond off the bat, with animosity or aggression,we should be good. If you throw a trash can at me, you should AT LEAST expect the same from me.
I was very surprised at that endorsement. I would expect DMN would do that but not the FWST. Pretty shocking IMO.
I knew we were gonna need a safe space but was too timid to say so.I don't think that I'll ever be able to move forward from this.
Excuse me as I curl up in the fetal position in the corner of a room, and start mumbling to myself.
A safe space with puppies and hot chocolate?I knew we were gonna need a safe space but was too timid to say so.
I refer you to post #27 of this thread by BABYFACE.scheiss off
Does that mean this is just an epic participation trophy?
Use an alias, that ought to get them.Oh yeah. I am hurting and may never recover
A few days ago I read an article, the FWST about their editorial boards endorsement of a candidate and commented how that editorial board would have endorsed Karl Marx.
The comment has been removed and I apparently I have been banned as I am denied access to login.
So they can have their opinions but if mine, or others aren't in lockstep with them, you're out.
Man it hurts.
What you describe is not snowflake behavior. You are painting way too broadly, but a lot of people already do that with overused labels like racist and homophobe.I will repeat, the term snowflakes is not just for the left anymore and this topic proves it. Mommy, the are not letting me play like I used too and I want to take my ball and go home!! Bunch of babies that a viewpoint that was in vogue in the past is changing. Get used to it men
Don't know how things will turn out but that looks like endorsements from a fleet of Titanics.
Calling up a newspaper to complain about a endorsement is , as you say, "A snowflake is someone who can’t tolerate hearing opposing views" is a snowflake move.What you describe is not snowflake behavior. You are painting way too broadly, but a lot of people already do that with overused labels like racist and homophobe.
A snowflake is someone who can’t tolerate hearing opposing views, even if they are free to respond on an equivalent basis. Snowflakes don’t want equivalent opportunity. They simply want to shut down the other side completely and end all debate. They want their voice to be the only one heard.
Nobody in this thread has argued for that, hence, no snowflakes.
If you’re going to start throwing labels around, at least use them in a context where it actually applies. Not in a situation where you’re misapplying it to shut down opponents and justify politically motivated censorship.
Calling up a newspaper to complain about a endorsement is , as you say, "A snowflake is someone who can’t tolerate hearing opposing views" is a snowflake move.
which goes with deeps definition, "A snowflake is someone who can’t tolerate hearing opposing views" and calls to complain about how unfair it is that others are getting perceived special treatment and not their sidePretty sure the poster said the phone call was related to a letter posting policy, not an opposing view. Just an equal access thing per the paper’s own policy.
which goes with deeps definition, "A snowflake is someone who can’t tolerate hearing opposing views" and calls to complain about how unfair it is that others are getting perceived special treatment and not their side
No, you said “calling up a newspaper to complain about an endorsement...” Now you are commenting on a Deep comment, not the comment of the individual who actually called the paper. You know, it’s like when you review a contract you have to actually read it.