tcumaniac
Full Member
As I continue to find ways to cope with our absolute ass beating on Saturday, I had this slightly irrational thought while trying to justify why we played so poorly.
Is there any possibility our game plan/strategy against OU depended on the outcome of the ISU vs OSU game?
I'm not saying this happened, but maybe TCU coaches felt like we had no possible way of beating OU twice. Maybe they felt that beating OU once would require pulling out all the bells and whistles and throwing every last thing we had at them. Something that wasn't likely to work twice.
Maybe after ISU lost and it became all but guaranteed that we would have to play OU twice, TCU decided to go with a much more conservative approach, saving our best shot for the next game in a less hostile stadium, with the conference championship on the line.
Not saying I necessarily think this is true. But it was a theory that at least made me feel better for a little bit.
At the very least I feel like it may have affected our approach after getting down in a substantial hole. It sure seemed like Patterson had tossed in the towel at times. Especially with some of our unexplainable punts on 4th and short.
With the way Baker played in the first half and with the rowdiness of that crowd, maybe Patterson was just like "we don't have it today. let's just minimize this loss and get out of here." It sure felt like it at least.
Is there any possibility our game plan/strategy against OU depended on the outcome of the ISU vs OSU game?
I'm not saying this happened, but maybe TCU coaches felt like we had no possible way of beating OU twice. Maybe they felt that beating OU once would require pulling out all the bells and whistles and throwing every last thing we had at them. Something that wasn't likely to work twice.
Maybe after ISU lost and it became all but guaranteed that we would have to play OU twice, TCU decided to go with a much more conservative approach, saving our best shot for the next game in a less hostile stadium, with the conference championship on the line.
Not saying I necessarily think this is true. But it was a theory that at least made me feel better for a little bit.
At the very least I feel like it may have affected our approach after getting down in a substantial hole. It sure seemed like Patterson had tossed in the towel at times. Especially with some of our unexplainable punts on 4th and short.
With the way Baker played in the first half and with the rowdiness of that crowd, maybe Patterson was just like "we don't have it today. let's just minimize this loss and get out of here." It sure felt like it at least.