In the aftermath of the Big XII missile crisis,
David Boren, the University of Oklahoma President and notorious
Bilbo Baggins look-a-like, said that it was never a sure bet that OU and A$M would follow UT west, that they had "other options" and would have explored them first. Here is a
link to ESPN, which for its other evils is not in the habit of reporting hearsay to get extra hits [ala Bleacher Report]. I have no dog in this fight whatsoever, but conventional wisdom is universally agreed that the Aggots did indeed have some kind of offer to join the SEC. Any conference in its right mind would jump at a chance to add them and the Sooners. I'm sure that's exactly what the SEC had planned -- those guys know which side their bread is buttered.
As for BYU, I agree that they would add much to the BE as a football-only member. I wouldn't mind that move at all. The combination of us joining the BE, BYU helping us out with our 2011 schedule after Tech jobbed us again, and the MWC kicking us on the rear-end on our way out has largely erased the bitterness I felt toward that school a year ago. The problem would be that BYU or any football-only option would leave basketball at an uneven 17 members. I am guessing that is one of several reasons the league is stalling over the 'Nova plan. As the original article in this thread noted, 18 schools could neatly split into two divisions. I guess they could have uneven basketball divisions, but that would create some scheduling issues and just generally look unsightly.
I don't think the long-term plan is going to involve staying at 9 football schools. I don't think there is a master plan yet worked out. I do think the league will do whatever the TV guys tells it is a good idea. And I do not think that our poster from USF knows as much about the inner workings of BE politics as he thinks he knows. [Or that USF is going to replace Miami in the food chain, ever -- for the record.]