Hoosierfrog
Tier 1
Bingo!
Where we ranked next week?
- Thread starter punter9
- Start date
Bingo!
Mean Purple
Active Member
The rankings are [ deposit from a bull that looks like Art Briles ] as usual.
AP has 6 teams ranked that are not even playing until weeks from now. You don't reward midwest candy asses with something for nothing.
Auburn is ranked 13 after having their ass violently handed to them on Saturday.
For folks who don't say this all does not matter in the end, you have not been watching since the College Football Invitational (CFP) was impelentmented. They pushed the early leaders off those rankings and it was dang hard to move them ... until they wanted to put one of their espn brands in and move someone out.
But ranking people 5 weeks into the season who have not seen a snap because they were playing politics, that's just some laughable [ Finebaum ] right there.
AP has 6 teams ranked that are not even playing until weeks from now. You don't reward midwest candy asses with something for nothing.
Auburn is ranked 13 after having their ass violently handed to them on Saturday.
For folks who don't say this all does not matter in the end, you have not been watching since the College Football Invitational (CFP) was impelentmented. They pushed the early leaders off those rankings and it was dang hard to move them ... until they wanted to put one of their espn brands in and move someone out.
But ranking people 5 weeks into the season who have not seen a snap because they were playing politics, that's just some laughable [ Finebaum ] right there.
CountryFrog
Active Member
I'm not a fan at all of the teams who still haven't played a game being ranked. Preseason rankings are a joke but at least every team is in the same spot having not played. Continuing to put a team in your rankings for 2 months without having seen them play a single game is ludicrous.
Kiss my pumpkin ass 2020
Kiss my pumpkin ass 2020
Eight
Member
the rankings are not about accuracy, but marketing
CountryFrog
Active Member
Agree, at least up until the very last rankings.
Even from a marketing perspective though it doesn't make sense. Wouldn't you rather have your rankings filled with teams who are actively playing games so that more games have more ranked matchups? Instead what we have is a quarter of the ranked teams being on a perpetual off week for 2+ months.
Eight
Member
think there is the belief that conversation is good which motivates some of the decisions
Jefffrog1993
KMA
the freaking eye test BS just pisses me off to no end!
