Both, but I think we have more of a talent problem than most will admit. I'm not happy with Dykes's leadership, but I can't blame coordinators for players not being able to tackle, not being able to block, dropping passes, fumbling, getting off blocks, covering with PI, etc. These are all things that these players have been doing since they were 5. Some of these are ongoing problems that have been present for a while as we've changed coaching staffs. So many thought Gillespie was the problem on defense, wanted him gone, and had such high expectations for the new guy just because it was a different guy making the calls. Well, we have the same issues as we've been having. I feel changes need to be made at the top, but it doesn't matter who we get if we don't have players that can execute. It's so easy to blame coaches for everything that goes wrong, but just watch the games and look at the details beyond "well he shouldn't have called this play on 4th and 2." What actually happened on that play? We're getting whooped across the board. Dykes was the same coach he was 2 years ago, last year Gillespie was the same coach he was in the prior year. What was the difference? The players, mainly our offensive players. Scheme and play-calling does not matter if you don't execute. I can't think of any great coaches who won without great players. Just about every great coach we know across any sport had great players. Just look at the Spurs and Patriots over the last few years. Each had what most consider the best coach in that respective sport. Those teams have been HORRIBLE since their star players either left or retired, even though the coach remained. College football is no different. I am a firm believer that great players make great coaches, not the other way around. Can they be developed into greatness through coaching? Absolutely, but most of the ones that are developed into greatness are already partly there before they get developed.