Fan Nation
Forums
Forum list
Search forums
Rules & Policies
Podcast
Mobile App
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Shop
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Horned Frog Athletics
Scott & Wes Frog Fan Forum
SMU hate week... what are they saying on Ponyfans?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Purp" data-source="post: 2758639" data-attributes="member: 12852"><p>Strangely, all of our sacks are coming from Blacklock and our LBs. I agree our pass rush will present problems that have yet to see, but I think the coverages will be a bigger factor for them than the pass rush. They haven't seen a defense what feels like it has 13 guys on the field yet. I think Brohm said he thought there were 15 out there.</p><p></p><p>Purdue did present some challenges for us. The TE is a weapon that has always been a nightmare for us. Aside from two big plays (one rather fluky on a broken play) we did a nice job bottling him up. And obviously Moore is a bigger weapon than anybody SMU has and he just couldn't find a space to get the ball all night.</p><p></p><p>I think our defense will confound the SMU offense. Aside from a couple of big plays on youthful mistakes and some trick plays I don't see them being much more prolific than Purdue. I'm thinking less than 300 total yards of offense unless trick plays gouge us for 150+. I agree our secondary will be stretched more than Purdue tried to do, but I think there's a reason Purdue didn't try it much and I think SMU will have a hell of a time overcoming that too.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Purp, post: 2758639, member: 12852"] Strangely, all of our sacks are coming from Blacklock and our LBs. I agree our pass rush will present problems that have yet to see, but I think the coverages will be a bigger factor for them than the pass rush. They haven't seen a defense what feels like it has 13 guys on the field yet. I think Brohm said he thought there were 15 out there. Purdue did present some challenges for us. The TE is a weapon that has always been a nightmare for us. Aside from two big plays (one rather fluky on a broken play) we did a nice job bottling him up. And obviously Moore is a bigger weapon than anybody SMU has and he just couldn't find a space to get the ball all night. I think our defense will confound the SMU offense. Aside from a couple of big plays on youthful mistakes and some trick plays I don't see them being much more prolific than Purdue. I'm thinking less than 300 total yards of offense unless trick plays gouge us for 150+. I agree our secondary will be stretched more than Purdue tried to do, but I think there's a reason Purdue didn't try it much and I think SMU will have a hell of a time overcoming that too. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Which team did TCU defeat in the College Football Playoffs?
Post reply
Forums
Horned Frog Athletics
Scott & Wes Frog Fan Forum
SMU hate week... what are they saying on Ponyfans?
Top