Fan Nation
Forums
Forum list
Search forums
Rules & Policies
Podcast
Mobile App
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Shop
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Horned Frog Athletics
Scott & Wes Frog Fan Forum
Report: UT, A&M to Big 10
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ShivasFrog" data-source="post: 574310" data-attributes="member: 2738"><p>QUOTE(YA @ Jun 10 2010, 04:52 PM) [snapback]574292[/snapback]</p><p>One site is reporting that a$m wiuld bring baylor along to the SEC.</p><p><a href="http://www.garnetandblackattack.com/2010/6/10/1510753/how-the-sec-could-pry-texas-a-m" target="_blank">OMG!!!</a></p><p></p><p></p><p>"While Baylor brings nothing to the table for the Pac-10, the potential for the SEC to swoop in and grab the second biggest prize in the Big 12 makes the Bears very valuable to the Southeastern Conference. A second Texas school gives even more exposure to SEC programs who would look to build new recruiting pipelines in the Lone Star state, <strong>and the Bears would not threaten anyone in the sport that matters most. As others have pointed out, there is something to be said for adding conference depth rather than another power program to what is already a murderer's row of football powers.</strong> The fact that Baylor is currently decent in basketball and traditionally competitive in baseball is just icing on the cake. If you are the SEC, you take your medicine to get Texas A&M and the Houston market."</p><p></p><p>Baylor being considered <strong>because</strong> they suck so bad at football. What a total cluster-[deleted].</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ShivasFrog, post: 574310, member: 2738"] QUOTE(YA @ Jun 10 2010, 04:52 PM) [snapback]574292[/snapback] One site is reporting that a$m wiuld bring baylor along to the SEC. [URL="http://www.garnetandblackattack.com/2010/6/10/1510753/how-the-sec-could-pry-texas-a-m"]OMG!!![/URL] "While Baylor brings nothing to the table for the Pac-10, the potential for the SEC to swoop in and grab the second biggest prize in the Big 12 makes the Bears very valuable to the Southeastern Conference. A second Texas school gives even more exposure to SEC programs who would look to build new recruiting pipelines in the Lone Star state, [B]and the Bears would not threaten anyone in the sport that matters most. As others have pointed out, there is something to be said for adding conference depth rather than another power program to what is already a murderer's row of football powers.[/B] The fact that Baylor is currently decent in basketball and traditionally competitive in baseball is just icing on the cake. If you are the SEC, you take your medicine to get Texas A&M and the Houston market." Baylor being considered [B]because[/B] they suck so bad at football. What a total cluster-[deleted]. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Which team did TCU defeat in the College Football Playoffs?
Post reply
Forums
Horned Frog Athletics
Scott & Wes Frog Fan Forum
Report: UT, A&M to Big 10
Top