Fan Nation
Forums
Forum list
Search forums
Rules & Policies
Podcast
Mobile App
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Shop
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Horned Frog Athletics
Scott & Wes Frog Fan Forum
Next in the transportal...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Eight" data-source="post: 2728544" data-attributes="member: 73370"><p>never said the results of the past three years were bad things and i think that dixon got more from trent's players than trent did or would have had he remained the head coach. </p><p></p><p>additionally, i have never indicated i wanted jamie fired but none of that precludes the fact that over 70% of jamie's first three recruiting classes are gone and this team is looking at going into next season short handed in the front court. if the continued turnover and underwhelming production from jamie's first three classes are not in some way the responsibility of the head coach i am confused who should be responsible. </p><p></p><p>i completely agree with countryfrog and farm frogs sentiments that we can't go back and reverse what is done so that means to hope jamie and his staff have indeed brought in the level of players needed to compete in the big 12 and we are done with the roster turnover.</p><p></p><p>what i have never agreed with is the idea this was a one year blip, it is a way of the modern college game, and we are expecting too much too soon to think players can make an impact in their first year or two in the program when there is evidence to show otherwise in each case.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Eight, post: 2728544, member: 73370"] never said the results of the past three years were bad things and i think that dixon got more from trent's players than trent did or would have had he remained the head coach. additionally, i have never indicated i wanted jamie fired but none of that precludes the fact that over 70% of jamie's first three recruiting classes are gone and this team is looking at going into next season short handed in the front court. if the continued turnover and underwhelming production from jamie's first three classes are not in some way the responsibility of the head coach i am confused who should be responsible. i completely agree with countryfrog and farm frogs sentiments that we can't go back and reverse what is done so that means to hope jamie and his staff have indeed brought in the level of players needed to compete in the big 12 and we are done with the roster turnover. what i have never agreed with is the idea this was a one year blip, it is a way of the modern college game, and we are expecting too much too soon to think players can make an impact in their first year or two in the program when there is evidence to show otherwise in each case. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Which team did TCU defeat in the College Football Playoffs?
Post reply
Forums
Horned Frog Athletics
Scott & Wes Frog Fan Forum
Next in the transportal...
Top