Fan Nation
Forums
Forum list
Search forums
Rules & Policies
Podcast
Mobile App
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Shop
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Horned Frog Athletics
Scott & Wes Frog Fan Forum
Let's throw this scenario out there . . .
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HUT-Frog" data-source="post: 574021" data-attributes="member: 35582"><p>QUOTE(dweller @ Jun 10 2010, 02:17 PM) [snapback]574019[/snapback]</p><p>The reason Colorado may have accepted the invite today is BECAUSE Baylor was invited to the meeting. If Colorado were worried about Texas pressure to replace them with Baylor, they just prempted it. Now UT and AM can say they tried but PAC 10 already tied their hands.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Very possible. But if so, the Pac 10 took a big risk by officially inviting CU before UT and A&M were officially onboard.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HUT-Frog, post: 574021, member: 35582"] QUOTE(dweller @ Jun 10 2010, 02:17 PM) [snapback]574019[/snapback] The reason Colorado may have accepted the invite today is BECAUSE Baylor was invited to the meeting. If Colorado were worried about Texas pressure to replace them with Baylor, they just prempted it. Now UT and AM can say they tried but PAC 10 already tied their hands. Very possible. But if so, the Pac 10 took a big risk by officially inviting CU before UT and A&M were officially onboard. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Which team did TCU defeat in the College Football Playoffs?
Post reply
Forums
Horned Frog Athletics
Scott & Wes Frog Fan Forum
Let's throw this scenario out there . . .
Top