Big Frog II
Active Member
It was a physical tough game. No team looked particularly good. It was hard to get in a flow, but winning ugly is fine in my book.Would’ve thought we lost from reading most of the posts in this thread.
It was a physical tough game. No team looked particularly good. It was hard to get in a flow, but winning ugly is fine in my book.Would’ve thought we lost from reading most of the posts in this thread.
It's hard to get in a flow in any game when there are that many whistles. My least favorite kind of games. OU was in the bonus and TCU was one foul from being in the bonus less than 9 minutes into the 2nd half.It was a physical tough game. No team looked particularly good. It was hard to get in a flow, but winning ugly is fine in my book.
I love seeing the pressure on the perimeter, despite the risk of lobs and cutters. It lets the quick guys force the action while showing confidence in players' discipline to not blow their assignment and athleticism to close and challenge at the rim.While last year’s team led CBB in fast break points, it felt like they could be slowed down if the other team wanted to slow it down. This years team seems different. We are forcing more turnovers than last year which helps, but there were times last night OU was back on defense but we just forced it at them anyway. We lead CBB in fast break points by over 5 points per game. The distance between us and the second place team is same as the second place team to the 70th place team.
they called it super tight but i thought it was tight both ways.Refs were horrible both ways last night, with several wrong calls and unnecessary foul calls. Glad the frogs pulled it out and never really seemed to be in trouble.
Agreed, just a lot of ticky-tack fouls that could have gone uncalled making the game harder to watch but the frogs turned it on for the second halfthey called it super tight but i thought it was tight both ways.
We missed two dunks and two layups. Along with the cold shooting from 3 during the same stretch it made me nervous. But OU was unable to take advantage and we actually grew the lead.We make a normal # of our shots from within 4 feet, and that game isn't even close. I hope (and believe) that the team is feeling their power.
Miller missed those I believe.We missed two dunks and two layups. Along with the cold shooting from 3 during the same stretch it made me nervous. But OU was unable to take advantage and we actually grew the lead.
He missed one. I think Cork missed the other IIRC.Miller missed those I believe.
Old enough to remember chanting S-E-C at Daniel Meyer against Arky and Oliver Miller.Loved the S-E-C chant at end end too!
He missed one. I think Cork missed the other IIRC.
Yup. Good defense on our part almost all night (and OU for a good chunk of the game too, credit where it's due). We also missed a bunch of really short bank shots that we normally make most of. Exciting first two games and almost the optimal result from them. Really excited for SaturdayWe missed two dunks and two layups. Along with the cold shooting from 3 during the same stretch it made me nervous. But OU was unable to take advantage and we actually grew the lead.
Cork is listed at 6-9. Probably really 6-8. Of our centers he has the best offensive moves inside. He is a warrior on defense. He’s a guy who has to work hard to overcome his deficiencies. Glad we have him.Cork makes me lose my dodge ram mind! Only 7' guy who when he gets the ball holds it at his knees so little guys can get to it.....right before he goes up soft and misses an easy shot.
i love this team, but if you take our 3 big guys' best traits and combine them i don't know you'd have an elite big man. ugh.