MountainWestFrog
Active Member
I know these change every second, but really like todays two choices. Michigan State in the Rose Bowl or Alabama in the Sugar Bowl. Much prefer the NC, but those are not bad either.
We lost the 2010 national championship in 2010 - Fiesta Bowl 2010 - by losing to an "inferior" Boise squad.I seriously doubt a shot at the NC with Boise in the way. I think the voters will push them to #2 over us if they have to and the NC will be Boise v. Oregon.
If you told me a year ago that we may have to settle for a BCS bowl instead of the MNC if we win out, I would have told you that you are dreaming. My how far we have come.
I know these change every second, but really like todays two choices. Michigan State in the Rose Bowl or Alabama in the Sugar Bowl. Much prefer the NC, but those are not bad either.
The Rose Bowl against anybody would be unbelievable. I mean it's the freaking ROSE BOWL.
...do you really trust Oklahoma to run the table the rest of the way? I don't, for much the same reason I don't trust Oregon or No. 4 Auburn: the lack of an elite defense. As riveting as it was to watch the Ducks storm back to beat Stanford 52-31 and the Tigers put away Arkansas 65-43, national-championship teams don't give up 28 points per game in conference play like Oregon, or let Arkansas' backup quarterback complete 15 of his first 17 passes like Auburn. (I'm not writing off Oklahoma yet, but the Sooners rank 72nd in total defense.)
As Texas reminded us so vividly Saturday against the previously splashy Huskers, even the most dangerous offense can be tempered by a dominant defense. Thus, amid this budding season of chaos, it may be time to start embracing the steady hand. And as much as fans of the bluebloods refuse to hear it, the BCS' current No. 3 team, Boise State, may actually be worthy of No. 1.
Any BCS bowl is a fine result. Title is preferred, but another BCS bowl beats the heck out of playing in San Diego or Houston again.