Volare
Full Member
I know what the 1 is, what is the half?
Defense
- Thread starter grt
- Start date
Endless Purple
Full Member
I love all the extremist takes based on one game against a team that we had NO FILM on to really judge how they would play on offense (all new staff AND all new players). Huge benefit for an offense. Not to mention, they were fired up to play.
We lost because the defense could have been a little better, we threw two picks on the goal line, and we went 75% pass on the last drive, when we could run the ball. No one element to blame.
We lost because the defense could have been a little better, we threw two picks on the goal line, and we went 75% pass on the last drive, when we could run the ball. No one element to blame.
Chongo94
Active Member
The defense could have been A LOT better.
Sangria Wine
Active Member
Welp that ballgame has turned around in the second half and the TCU defense is suddenly looking a little better. LOL!
Here’s to beating Nichols State like a rag doll to exercise a bunch of demons.
Here’s to beating Nichols State like a rag doll to exercise a bunch of demons.
Froggy Style
Active Member
....and I'm saying put one on the other side too especially vs 3-4 WRs and a speedy RB.
JugbandFrog
Full Member
Michigan 1st half was pretty good
JugbandFrog
Full Member
I’m currently hoping Baylor continues his to struggle, they fire Aranda and we scoop him up
Horny4TCU
Active Member
It's gonna be a long season fellers. The defense is just coming out flat and afraid to hit anyone. The second string did great in the 4th quarter. I would make the first string run bleachers and put the second string in until the starters earn it and light a fire under their arses.
*edit - this is why I don't coach or make money at it*
*edit - this is why I don't coach or make money at it*
Limey Frog
Full Member
First page of this thread didn't age especially well. I felt the same way mid-way through Colorado's second quarter, but that's why you don't publish first half hot takes. I think two weeks in Colorado is looking like a legit contender in the Pac, albeit one whose depth will likely keep them around upper mid-tier in the end. TCU's defensive front may be a problem--it certainly won't be a strength of this team, but I don't think the takeaway from Colorado-Nebraska yesterday is that TCU sucks.
NewFrogFan
Full Member
I vote 3-4 and get rid of a safety that cant cover anyway. Banks and Brooks looked like ambulances headed to a fire.
An-Cap Frog
Member
There is something that I cannot stand/figure out with the new defense. Maybe it's just me but I feel like in passing situations that out Lbers are just standing there. Not rushing, not defending. I feel like there is less pattern matching with this D and more zone. Can anyone back me up?
Frogs1983
Full Member
Iowa State?
They were literally point shaving.
Frogs1983
Full Member
Lol
NewFrogFan
Full Member
Except when they put Banks and Brooks in together!
4 Oaks Frog
Active Member
CU is not [ Finebaum ]ty…
Sangria Wine
Active Member
They were literally point shaving.
Don’t let trivial details like that get in the way. [ What the heck? ] is wrong with you?
Don’t let trivial details like that get in the way. [ What the heck? ] is wrong with you?
Last edited:
They bet the under on their own games. They’re lucky to get a slap on the wrist.
Sangria Wine
Active Member
I was joking
