West Texas Frog
Active Member
Why should Boise St. be automatically left out of consideration for a bcs bowl?
Didn't they basically flip flop with TCU in battling Stanford for the final at large spot?
Let's play out this realistic scenario:
Auburn/Oregon National Championship
TCU/Wisconsin Rose Bowl
Big East Winner/Oklahoma St. Fiesta Bowl
ACC Winner/Ohio St. Orange Bowl
SEC #2/????? Sugar Bowl
The ACC and Big East only get one team, and if Oklahoma St. wins out then Nebraska, OU and Texas A&M all finish with at least 3 losses. An at-large team with 3 losses should not be chosen over a one loss BSU team that will be ranked higher in all polls. That leaves Stanford as the only other possible candidate in competition with Boise St. I think BSU would bring a hell of a lot more fans to New Orleans than Stanford. It is a no brainer to pick BSU for the Sugar.
Didn't they basically flip flop with TCU in battling Stanford for the final at large spot?
Let's play out this realistic scenario:
Auburn/Oregon National Championship
TCU/Wisconsin Rose Bowl
Big East Winner/Oklahoma St. Fiesta Bowl
ACC Winner/Ohio St. Orange Bowl
SEC #2/????? Sugar Bowl
The ACC and Big East only get one team, and if Oklahoma St. wins out then Nebraska, OU and Texas A&M all finish with at least 3 losses. An at-large team with 3 losses should not be chosen over a one loss BSU team that will be ranked higher in all polls. That leaves Stanford as the only other possible candidate in competition with Boise St. I think BSU would bring a hell of a lot more fans to New Orleans than Stanford. It is a no brainer to pick BSU for the Sugar.