Keep looking. Doesn't seem clear at all to me. Both teams playing strong defense, but all GA's yards coming on about 3 long passes, and Cincy is having steady success maintaining drives. GA has more obvious starsies, but the "team" playing better at this point is Cincy.
They are showing they deserved to be in the beauty pageant, much more than tOSU or ND. I don't care if they "only" beat certain teams by "not enough," it's hard to go through a full schedule undefeated, whatever the league. Even if they wind up losing this game, they earned the right to be in the pageant and their being left out pretty well proves how corrupt the selection process is.
what game are you watching? There’s been multiple phantom calls on Georgia like the block in the back.
cincy struggling to run the ball and living off broken plays or weak DB play by UGA
I understand if you didn't mean it to be absolute but the way you said it was pretty absolute.Well no, I didn't say it's absolute, there is obviously always going to be more analysis required than simply the W-L and treat all other things as equal. But these guys played at a high enough level all season to show they were legit.
Compare that for example with Florida, who had they beaten Bama in the SEC CCG, I'm guessing would've gotten in with iirc, ONE victory vs. a team with a winning record- that being Bama.
I really hope all the 8-team speculation comes to be, it would solve a lot of this nonsense. Truthfully I miss the old days where you got a bowl based on conference affiliation and then everyone could argue about the final rankings after all the bowls, but that ship sailed and it ain't coming back so let's have a legit playoff if we're going to call it a playoff.
It obviously has an impact. But aren't you the one who's always saying that you don't want to hear about injuries with TCU because it's always being exaggerated? So I don't know what the difference is there.I think it’s funny how people pretend the opt outs for prepping for the draft don’t have an impact. Georgia is missing two O-lineman, a tight end, two CBs and a linebacker. I presume all were among their better players and all would be playing if the game were a month ago. That'd be like us having Storment, Avila, Wells, Tomlinson, Caesar, and Wallow decide not to play and acting like it doesn't really matter. Of course these opt outs change things. A lot in some cases.
Brilliant play design I have no idea where the football is
I'd assume that a team with consistent top 5 recruiting classes should have the depth to overcome that. And beat a G5 team.I think it’s funny how people pretend the opt outs for prepping for the draft don’t have an impact. Georgia is missing two O-lineman, a tight end, two CBs and a linebacker. I presume all were among their better players and all would be playing if the game were a month ago. That'd be like us having Storment, Avila, Wells, Tomlinson, Caesar, and Wallow decide not to play and acting like it doesn't really matter. Of course these opt outs change things. A lot in some cases.
It obviously has an impact. But aren't you the one who's always saying that you don't want to hear about injuries with TCU because it's always being exaggerated? So I don't know what the difference is there.
Plus the general media opinion with SEC team superiority always includes their unmatched depth. But then as soon as they actually have to utilize that depth and lose then it's because they were missing guys.
Late night "in quarantine" last nightLMAO at the shot of that Georgia player yawning on the sideline.
LMAO at the shot of that Georgia player yawning on the sideline.
I'd assume that a team with consistent top 5 recruiting classes should have the depth to overcome that. And beat a G5 team.
I don't want to hear about injuries when it clearly is exaggerated. Like GP saying last year that 40 guys were hurt or something ridiculous like that, when it was clear from watching games and seeing who was playing that the number was far, far, less than that. I get that injuries matter, but everyone deals with injuries, people tend to just magnify their own and ignore everyone else's.
But having 6 starters opt out after a season in which you're already dealing with typical injury attrition....how can that not make a huge difference?
I think you just try so hard to be objective TCU fan with some things that it quickly becomes contradictory. The idea that opt outs are a bigger deal than injuries is laughable.I don't want to hear about injuries when it clearly is exaggerated. Like GP saying last year that 40 guys were hurt or something ridiculous like that, when it was clear from watching games and seeing who was playing that the number was far, far, less than that. I get that injuries matter, but everyone deals with injuries, people tend to just magnify their own and ignore everyone else's.
But having 6 starters opt out after a season in which you're already dealing with typical injury attrition....how can that not make a huge difference?
I think you just try so hard to be objective TCU fan with some things that it quickly becomes contradictory. The idea that opt outs are a bigger deal than injuries is laughable.
But if you really do believe that added attrition for one team over another is a big deal than I'm sure you'd agree that a team like Ohio St should never warrant playoff consideration having experienced roughly half the attrition of their competition this year.
Georgia had this season 67 5&4 star rated recruits on their roster. Cincinnati 6.I'd assume that a team with consistent top 5 recruiting classes should have the depth to overcome that. And beat a G5 team.