ftwfrog
Active Member
What Mack's saying is, why students and parents would choose UT over A&M. "Hey parent _____________, you can go watch your kid play every weekend if they go to UT. We play at Baylor, Tech, Dallas, etc. While A&M plays in Florida, Georgia, Alabama, etc " He's talking about recruiting now, not expansion.Don't mistakenly apply the transitive property to his statement. He is speaking in the context of what would happen if the Big 12 were to dissolve. In other words, he's using the "proximity" argument as a reason for Tech, Baylor, OU, OSU, UT and A&M to stay together (obviously, A&M is moot now).
When he says "...in the future, we'll still look for what is best...", he does not mean "look for" as in "consider this factor as we look at expansion teams." What he means is, "we will consider this factor heavily before deciding to leave/implode the Big 12 as we know it today."
In other words, it's not about expansion. It's about not losing what you have.
Or not... I don't know