D. Anderson 6

[ETXFrog]

Is a better runner than Hicks. He hits the hole. NM

 

[RollToad]

Good thread. Would read again.

 

[McFroggin]

I've been saying this for a year.

 

[ETXFrog]

Same here. He is significantly better

 

[Frognosticator]

I've been saying this for a year.

I have silently agreed with you for a year.

 

[DeuceBoogieNights]

Hicks is a more dynamic weapon. Rushing and receiving. Can't agree with you on this one. Not discrediting Anderson though, just saying you're under valuing Hicks.

 

[Chico Dusty]

Hicks is a more dynamic weapon. Rushing and receiving. Can't agree with you on this one. Not discrediting Anderson though, just saying you're under valuing Hicks.

It's not under valuing Hicks, it's just obviously #6 is a better back. I think Hicks is very valuable, but I'd rather give the ball to Anderson. And for the people that argue Hicks is a better receiver - how do we know #6 is not a weapon catching the ball? I haven't see him do it yet, doesn't mean he can't.

 

[ETXFrog]

Hicks is a more dynamic weapon. Rushing and receiving. Can't agree with you on this one. Not discrediting Anderson though, just saying you're under valuing Hicks.

Hicks is valuable yes, I just think he tip toes way too much behind the line! I love Andersons running style especially how he hits the hole.

 

[AroundWorldFrog]

The run at Texas told me all I ever needed to know about him. North/south runner with great acceleration and vision. He'll be elite by the time he leaves TCU.

 

[Double V]

All 3 of our backs (Hicks, DA6, Sewo) are STUDS! When used correctly, we will do great things!

 

[Atomic Frawg]

Good thread. Would read again.

Ok, I laughed.