agree, but i don't think it is only a matter of a player deserving all the snaps
when baylor was in the heyday of the briles hunh they would throw a large number of receivers in the rotation as much to wear out the secondaries they faced as anything else.
the frogs aren't running that tempo so what is actually achieved by running a large number of receivers on the field?
Right. Is rotating all those players really increasing our chances of winning? Or is it just so we can get a bunch of guys some playing time? It sure seems like the latter. If it's the former, I'd like to hear an explanation of how.
You could tell a difference in Iowa State in how they made adjustments, set plays up, and attacked certain weaknesses in our defense. We on the other seem like we go into a game wanting to do a whole bunch of different stuff and we just make sure we use it all at one point or another, game situation or flow be damned.