Fan Nation
Forums
Forum list
Search forums
Rules & Policies
Podcast
Mobile App
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Shop
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Horned Frog Athletics
Scott & Wes Frog Fan Forum
TCU Golf 2021-2022
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JogginFrog" data-source="post: 3036214" data-attributes="member: 4994"><p>Berzina finishes at +8, which is right in the middle of the field, scoring wise; but he won't advance. Looks like there's a 9-for-1 playoff for those finishing at +3.</p><p></p><p>Hamm finishes at +17. As suggested by his past results, he tends to check out once he is out of contention. He got the poor side of the draw, as scoring at Oakmont averaged 2 strokes higher for those who played it in Round 1 (pre-rain). Meanwhile, Longue Vue actually played a shade harder in Round 2--probably a result of guys checking out or taking chances in a bid to get some strokes back.</p><p></p><p>Those advancing to match play include:</p><p>- WVU's Mark Goetz, the #1 seed at -8, including a 68 at Oakmont (edit)</p><p>- 3 Oklahoma State players (Stark, Jin, Gupta); Stark shot 66-69 to place T4.</p><p>- SMU's Ollie Osborne, last year's runner-up, who needed every bit of his 69 at Oakmont in Round 2 to slide in at +2</p><p>- K-State's Cooper Schultz</p><p>- UT's Parker Coody and Mason Nome (edit - & Travis Vick)</p><p>- (edit) UT Arlington's Caleb Hicks</p><p>- Arky's Mateo Fernandez de Oliveira, who made the Round of 16 last year.</p><p></p><p>Edit: [USER=3599]@gohornedfrogs[/USER] is correct -- it's a 12-for-1 playoff. Online scoring excluded a few names for a bit and I wondered if a few of the early finishers hadn't stuck around. I never understand that, even with long odds. KU's Luke Kluver is among those in the playoff.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JogginFrog, post: 3036214, member: 4994"] Berzina finishes at +8, which is right in the middle of the field, scoring wise; but he won't advance. Looks like there's a 9-for-1 playoff for those finishing at +3. Hamm finishes at +17. As suggested by his past results, he tends to check out once he is out of contention. He got the poor side of the draw, as scoring at Oakmont averaged 2 strokes higher for those who played it in Round 1 (pre-rain). Meanwhile, Longue Vue actually played a shade harder in Round 2--probably a result of guys checking out or taking chances in a bid to get some strokes back. Those advancing to match play include: - WVU's Mark Goetz, the #1 seed at -8, including a 68 at Oakmont (edit) - 3 Oklahoma State players (Stark, Jin, Gupta); Stark shot 66-69 to place T4. - SMU's Ollie Osborne, last year's runner-up, who needed every bit of his 69 at Oakmont in Round 2 to slide in at +2 - K-State's Cooper Schultz - UT's Parker Coody and Mason Nome (edit - & Travis Vick) - (edit) UT Arlington's Caleb Hicks - Arky's Mateo Fernandez de Oliveira, who made the Round of 16 last year. Edit: [USER=3599]@gohornedfrogs[/USER] is correct -- it's a 12-for-1 playoff. Online scoring excluded a few names for a bit and I wondered if a few of the early finishers hadn't stuck around. I never understand that, even with long odds. KU's Luke Kluver is among those in the playoff. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Which team did TCU defeat in the College Football Playoffs?
Post reply
Forums
Horned Frog Athletics
Scott & Wes Frog Fan Forum
TCU Golf 2021-2022
Top