Fan Nation
Forums
Forum list
Search forums
Rules & Policies
Podcast
Mobile App
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Shop
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Horned Frog Athletics
Scott & Wes Frog Fan Forum
SMU to BCS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="froginaustin" data-source="post: 912805" data-attributes="member: 785"><p>SMU would like to become another Baylor, holding on to conference-mates to produce AQ-level revenue without making serious investments-- paying a coach $2mm/year for a few years alone isn't enough.</p><p></p><p>SMU would apparently like to avoid doing what TCU had to do to get where we are today, and that is investing a whole lot of money over a long period of time to work to the top level of college football.</p><p></p><p>If they succeed, good for them I suppose. Why pay dearly for something that can be finagled on the cheap?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="froginaustin, post: 912805, member: 785"] SMU would like to become another Baylor, holding on to conference-mates to produce AQ-level revenue without making serious investments-- paying a coach $2mm/year for a few years alone isn't enough. SMU would apparently like to avoid doing what TCU had to do to get where we are today, and that is investing a whole lot of money over a long period of time to work to the top level of college football. If they succeed, good for them I suppose. Why pay dearly for something that can be finagled on the cheap? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Which team did TCU defeat in the College Football Playoffs?
Post reply
Forums
Horned Frog Athletics
Scott & Wes Frog Fan Forum
SMU to BCS
Top