Fan Nation
Forums
Forum list
Search forums
Rules & Policies
Podcast
Mobile App
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Shop
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Horned Frog Athletics
Scott & Wes Frog Fan Forum
Practice updates......
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jack the frog" data-source="post: 2438906" data-attributes="member: 8086"><p>Speaking of domino effect, we are going to be thin somewhere by definition when you consider that we carry 24 wide-receivers. To compare:</p><p></p><p>Alabama 16</p><p>Baylor 16</p><p>LSU 17</p><p>TECH 19</p><p></p><p>I don't know if it is our offensive coaching influence, the offensive scheme, the coaches seemingly panicked response to Baylor over the last two years manifested by what seems to be an attempt to stack WR numbers and getting faster and smaller on defense, or the fact that we just cannot find anyone that can catch the rock however we carry more wide-outs than just about anyone. It would be fair to say that if we would probably have seven more defenders gaining experience and adding depth on a typical GP led team if we were at an average WR carry rate. Our defensive depth deficiency is no accident. I hope we can find ten or so capable receivers with a few back-ups and go back to stacking defensive talent over the next few years.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jack the frog, post: 2438906, member: 8086"] Speaking of domino effect, we are going to be thin somewhere by definition when you consider that we carry 24 wide-receivers. To compare: Alabama 16 Baylor 16 LSU 17 TECH 19 I don't know if it is our offensive coaching influence, the offensive scheme, the coaches seemingly panicked response to Baylor over the last two years manifested by what seems to be an attempt to stack WR numbers and getting faster and smaller on defense, or the fact that we just cannot find anyone that can catch the rock however we carry more wide-outs than just about anyone. It would be fair to say that if we would probably have seven more defenders gaining experience and adding depth on a typical GP led team if we were at an average WR carry rate. Our defensive depth deficiency is no accident. I hope we can find ten or so capable receivers with a few back-ups and go back to stacking defensive talent over the next few years. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Which team did TCU defeat in the College Football Playoffs?
Post reply
Forums
Horned Frog Athletics
Scott & Wes Frog Fan Forum
Practice updates......
Top