Fan Nation
Forums
Forum list
Search forums
Rules & Policies
Podcast
Mobile App
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Shop
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Horned Frog Athletics
Scott & Wes Frog Fan Forum
PAC commissioner voted authority to expand conference
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Portland Frog" data-source="post: 569717" data-attributes="member: 145"><p>QUOTE(jadailyTCU @ Jun 6 2010, 10:54 PM) [snapback]569711[/snapback]</p><p>Yeah, that's what I'm hoping. The ACC and Big Least already have by far the least pull out of the the Bc$ conferences, and it won't help if they're raided to the point of needing to merge just to survive. I can't imagine that even a 16-team conference with UNC, NC State, Duke, Wake Forest, Virginia, Virginia Tech, West Virginia, Maryland, Pitt, BC, Cincy, Louisville, USF, UCF, Memphis and Southern Miss would have so much clout that they'll be able to keep a 12-team conference that includes TCU, Boise, Utah, BYU, Kansas and Kansas State (maybe Colorado) out entirely. I mean, that 16-team ACC would comprise six former C-USA schools, for Pete's sake. (Yes, I realize that the 12-team MWC would have one former C-USA school, and a 16-team MWC would likely have at least two).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Good point. It seems we are in a way "at the mercy" of the process that is unfolding. There may be nothing TCU can do if the BCS becomes four, 16 team super conferences. Where's the "rabbit" and who is going to pull it out of the hat? Even with all the success the frogs have had, "reacting" may be the only option. Our only option may be to try and regroup after the fact and fight for respect all over again from the outside, looking in, and try and get inclusion at a later date with whatever conference mates are left over in the MWC.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Portland Frog, post: 569717, member: 145"] QUOTE(jadailyTCU @ Jun 6 2010, 10:54 PM) [snapback]569711[/snapback] Yeah, that's what I'm hoping. The ACC and Big Least already have by far the least pull out of the the Bc$ conferences, and it won't help if they're raided to the point of needing to merge just to survive. I can't imagine that even a 16-team conference with UNC, NC State, Duke, Wake Forest, Virginia, Virginia Tech, West Virginia, Maryland, Pitt, BC, Cincy, Louisville, USF, UCF, Memphis and Southern Miss would have so much clout that they'll be able to keep a 12-team conference that includes TCU, Boise, Utah, BYU, Kansas and Kansas State (maybe Colorado) out entirely. I mean, that 16-team ACC would comprise six former C-USA schools, for Pete's sake. (Yes, I realize that the 12-team MWC would have one former C-USA school, and a 16-team MWC would likely have at least two). Good point. It seems we are in a way "at the mercy" of the process that is unfolding. There may be nothing TCU can do if the BCS becomes four, 16 team super conferences. Where's the "rabbit" and who is going to pull it out of the hat? Even with all the success the frogs have had, "reacting" may be the only option. Our only option may be to try and regroup after the fact and fight for respect all over again from the outside, looking in, and try and get inclusion at a later date with whatever conference mates are left over in the MWC. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Which team did TCU defeat in the College Football Playoffs?
Post reply
Forums
Horned Frog Athletics
Scott & Wes Frog Fan Forum
PAC commissioner voted authority to expand conference
Top