Fan Nation
Forums
Forum list
Search forums
Rules & Policies
Podcast
Mobile App
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Shop
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Horned Frog Athletics
Scott & Wes Frog Fan Forum
FWST: ‘There is no wrong.’ TCU’s Patterson delivers NIL message to local business leaders
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wexahu" data-source="post: 3053225" data-attributes="member: 72863"><p>I'll say it again......the free transfer rule is a <u><strong>far</strong></u> bigger deal. </p><p></p><p>With an 85 scholarship limit and the requirement of skipping a year in the case of a transfer, it's still a manageable situation even with NIL in place. Think about it. You'd have bidding wars for recruits but you wouldn't have open bidding wars for kids throughout college football <u>every year</u>. Teams would still have to recruit well and develop their own players to win. </p><p></p><p>Take away NIL but still allow kids to freely transfer, and you'd still have a disastrous situation. We all know that kids have been getting paid one way or another for years and years, that wasn't going to change. The big boys are still coming after your players, and they are going to get them. If teams miss on recruits or some kids don't pan out, they just go get someone else's players. </p><p></p><p>That little rule change they made where kids now don't have to sit out a year when they transfer changes EVERYTHING.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wexahu, post: 3053225, member: 72863"] I'll say it again......the free transfer rule is a [U][B]far[/B][/U] bigger deal. With an 85 scholarship limit and the requirement of skipping a year in the case of a transfer, it's still a manageable situation even with NIL in place. Think about it. You'd have bidding wars for recruits but you wouldn't have open bidding wars for kids throughout college football [U]every year[/U]. Teams would still have to recruit well and develop their own players to win. Take away NIL but still allow kids to freely transfer, and you'd still have a disastrous situation. We all know that kids have been getting paid one way or another for years and years, that wasn't going to change. The big boys are still coming after your players, and they are going to get them. If teams miss on recruits or some kids don't pan out, they just go get someone else's players. That little rule change they made where kids now don't have to sit out a year when they transfer changes EVERYTHING. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Which team did TCU defeat in the College Football Playoffs?
Post reply
Forums
Horned Frog Athletics
Scott & Wes Frog Fan Forum
FWST: ‘There is no wrong.’ TCU’s Patterson delivers NIL message to local business leaders
Top