Fan Nation
Forums
Forum list
Search forums
Rules & Policies
Podcast
Mobile App
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Shop
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Horned Frog Athletics
Scott & Wes Frog Fan Forum
CCG weekend thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="gofor2" data-source="post: 3112271" data-attributes="member: 72131"><p>I'm not a fan of "resumes" and "schedule difficulty" in college football because those are all terms used within the invitational system, which is biased and I think is a dog [ Finebaum ] system to begin with. In no other major sport are these silly arguments necessary, because playoffs are real. </p><p>But for arguments sake, lets talk about ohio state. What makes you think they had a more difficult schedule? 3 teams out of 14 in the big 10, finished ranked. In almost no year is the Big 10 schedule better than the Big 12, SEC or P12's. At best they move from 4th to 3rd, ahead of the Pac 12, in a given year. The ACC, well the ACC is almost always 5th out of the P5.</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">They lost to an unranked Virginia Tech team, <strong>in </strong>Columbus Ohio. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">It took them 2 OT's to beat an unranked Pedophile state team @ pedophile state. </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">If I recall, the combined win-loss records of their opponents were crap. perhaps this can be supported or dismissed with easily found data, but I don't have time to look it up.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">3 teams out of 14 in the big 10 finished ranked.</li> </ul></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="gofor2, post: 3112271, member: 72131"] I'm not a fan of "resumes" and "schedule difficulty" in college football because those are all terms used within the invitational system, which is biased and I think is a dog [ Finebaum ] system to begin with. In no other major sport are these silly arguments necessary, because playoffs are real. But for arguments sake, lets talk about ohio state. What makes you think they had a more difficult schedule? 3 teams out of 14 in the big 10, finished ranked. In almost no year is the Big 10 schedule better than the Big 12, SEC or P12's. At best they move from 4th to 3rd, ahead of the Pac 12, in a given year. The ACC, well the ACC is almost always 5th out of the P5. [LIST] [*]They lost to an unranked Virginia Tech team, [B]in [/B]Columbus Ohio. [*]It took them 2 OT's to beat an unranked Pedophile state team @ pedophile state. [*]If I recall, the combined win-loss records of their opponents were crap. perhaps this can be supported or dismissed with easily found data, but I don't have time to look it up. [*]3 teams out of 14 in the big 10 finished ranked. [/LIST] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Which team did TCU defeat in the College Football Playoffs?
Post reply
Forums
Horned Frog Athletics
Scott & Wes Frog Fan Forum
CCG weekend thread
Top