froginmn
Full Member
Who is playing true freshman QB's at a high level?One non-recruiting question would be to answer why our QB's take so long to develop whereas so many other schools can play true freshmen at a high level.
Who is playing true freshman QB's at a high level?One non-recruiting question would be to answer why our QB's take so long to develop whereas so many other schools can play true freshmen at a high level.
Who is playing true freshman QB's at a high level?
Iowa StateWho is playing true freshman QB's at a high level?
ClempsonWho is playing true freshman QB's at a high level?
5-5 is a high level?Texas Tech
Right, they have done a nice job "developing" the number one recruit in the nation.Clempson
5-5 is not a high level but football is a team sport. And he's missed I think 2 1/2 games due to injury. When he's played, he's played well.5-5 is a high level?
I didn’t realize games he didn’t play in counted against his record.5-5 is a high level?
Just answering the question, not trying to hit your moving goalposts.Right, they have done a nice job "developing" the number one recruit in the nation.
S&C...no more bulk at the expense of flexibility. Bulk is good, but not if you tear up stuff.
Good lord man, are you ever happy or is that just a British trait? So when you cut your wrists, please don't go side to side, you must go the length of the vein down the middle as it will be quicker for you.
Just trying to understand the comment that "so many other schools" have true freshmen playing QB at a high level.Just answering the question, not trying to hit your moving goalposts.
Just trying to understand the comment that "so many other schools" have true freshmen playing QB at a high level.
If I gave you all of those, including the number one recruit in the nation, there are three schools out of over a hundred achieving that distinction.
Three isn't a lot.
Just trying to understand the comment that "so many other schools" have true freshmen playing QB at a high level.
If I gave you all of those, including the number one recruit in the nation, there are three schools out of over a hundred achieving that distinction.
Three isn't a lot.
I just think there is a lot of cherry picking in these statements that "so many schools play true freshmen at a high level" and "other teams backup QBs look better prepared than ours" (watch your back, by the way, because you just dissed the baby Jesus). These arguments are circular to one another.Regardless of whether they are true freshman or not, I'm confident in saying that whenever other teams put in their backup QBs, way more often than not they look so much better prepared than ours do. I know you can find some anecdotal evidence that might suggest otherwise but I'm speaking generally. Our overall development of QBs over the past 6-7 years has generally sucked. We've been very fortunate a starter (not counting SR who maybe shouldn't have been starting anyway) hasn't gone down for any extended period of time in recent years.