got this from twitter
16 out of 35 bowl games (45%) had a lower announced attendance than the Texas HS 5A state title game did this year.
It seems to me that we change arguments to fit our stances whenever they are convenient. When people say we don't fill our own stadium, we use the "As a percent of capacity" argument, and when we want to show that we travel well to the biggest Bowl stadium, we use the overall attendance (even though we were clearly the minority fanbase). Can't really have it both ways, can we?Second place was Cotton Bowl at just over 83,000. We do travel, so STFU!
Agreed. I would have sold a kidney to get to Pasadena. But next year if we play in the New Mexico bowl, I'll probably stay home. Just as they didn't want Stanford in that game, I think even they would have sold out their allotment.We traveled well this year, no doubt, but proving that by stating the biggest bowl stadium had the largest overall attendance is a bit misleading, imo.
TCU could be in the Siberia Bowl and I would attend. I'm not going to stick my nose in the air and not support the team.Agreed. I would have sold a kidney to get to Pasadena. But next year if we play in the New Mexico bowl, I'll probably stay home. Just as they didn't want Stanford in that game, I think even they would have sold out their allotment.
TCU could be in the Siberia Bowl and I would attend. I'm not going to stick my nose in the air and not support the team.
Me neither, Brewing.Ah, the Rose Bowl. I never thought that the Sun Bowl of glorious memory would be eclipsed.
Your logic is faulty for a few reasons.Here's a couple of true statements:
People have criticized TCU as being a school that doesn't travel well to bowl games.
There were 34 bowl games this year.
Of the 34 bowl games this year, the one TCU was in BY FAR had the highest attendance--by over 10,000 over number 2 Cotton Bowl.
Argue with that all you want and make yourself look like a f ing idiot, but the argumentts about us not travelling well can end now.