Fan Nation
Forums
Forum list
Search forums
Rules & Policies
Podcast
Mobile App
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Shop
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Horned Frog Athletics
Scott & Wes Frog Fan Forum
TCU 360: Judge won’t throw out claim that TCU officials were indifferent to discrimination
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Paint It Purple" data-source="post: 2963356" data-attributes="member: 67408"><p>The book, whose title states the widely recognized position that America is in the midst of a deep partisan divide, attempts to explain cause and effect. Early on the author states that he is not offering any sort of defense of segregation or racism. He called out the "sham democracies of the South," and he points out that most of the book's criticism comes from those who have not read it. ( I don't think you took the time to read the article...did you? ) The book doesn't per se criticize the 1964 Civil Rights Act. <u>The book illustrates that the law moved power away from the normal constitutional and democratic process.</u> (a second constitution). Democratic decisions were moved to judges and bureaucrats from the people. He then asks the question and illustrates the consequences of ruling society via fiat versus the intended constitutional democratic process. In my opinion this is what happens when we think some extra-constitutional LAW is going to fix everything. Read the article...better yet, go buy the book.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Paint It Purple, post: 2963356, member: 67408"] The book, whose title states the widely recognized position that America is in the midst of a deep partisan divide, attempts to explain cause and effect. Early on the author states that he is not offering any sort of defense of segregation or racism. He called out the "sham democracies of the South," and he points out that most of the book's criticism comes from those who have not read it. ( I don't think you took the time to read the article...did you? ) The book doesn't per se criticize the 1964 Civil Rights Act. [U]The book illustrates that the law moved power away from the normal constitutional and democratic process.[/U] (a second constitution). Democratic decisions were moved to judges and bureaucrats from the people. He then asks the question and illustrates the consequences of ruling society via fiat versus the intended constitutional democratic process. In my opinion this is what happens when we think some extra-constitutional LAW is going to fix everything. Read the article...better yet, go buy the book. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Which team did TCU defeat in the College Football Playoffs?
Post reply
Forums
Horned Frog Athletics
Scott & Wes Frog Fan Forum
TCU 360: Judge won’t throw out claim that TCU officials were indifferent to discrimination
Top